The Republican
Peter Thiel co-founder @ PayPal, Palantir & Founders Fund
By Nick Ray Ball - 24th November to the 16th of December 2021
Introducing; Peter Thiel
I first heard of Peter Thiel in Elon Musk by Ashlee Vance, but the book I remembered more was The Accidental Billionaires by Ben Mezrich, which was made into the three-time Oscar winning film; The Social Network;
-13.46 Au Ch. 25
"It really was a fitting place for the meeting, it was one of the most impressive landmarks in the city, the behemoth at 555 California Street was an architectural wonder and enormous polished granite tower with thousands of bay windows that could be seen for miles. A 750-foot spire rising right out of the epicentre of the city’s financial district and the man they were on their way to meet - well he was nearly as impressive as the building itself, both in personal reputation and in what he had already achieved.
"Peters going to love you" Shaun (Parker) responded, "15 minutes in and out, that's all it's going to take." Deep down he was certain that he was right, Peter Theil the founding force behind the incredibly successful company PayPal, head of the multi-billion-dollar venture fund Clarium Capital, former chess master and one of the richest men in the country was intimidating, fast-talking and a true genius."
Merry Christmas Mr Thiel,
Presented in six parts
Presentation Part 1 - Offer to co-author SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future.
Jump to Part 1
Presentation Part 2 - The Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL Monopoly Algorithm:
Jump to Part 2
Presentation Part 3 - The 10 Technologies
Jump to Part 3
Presentation Part 4 - Conspirators and Heroes (Economists, Co-Founders and People of Interest)
Jump to Part 4
Presentation Part 5 - Countries
Jump to Part 5
Presentation Part 6 - The S-World Platform Venture
Jump to Part 6
Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
And The 10 Technologies
"The ability to understand something before it’s observed is at the heart of scientific thinking."
Carlo Rovelli - The Order of Time
Dear Peter,
I believe that there is nothing on this planet that you would like to know of more than this determined economic monopoly algorithm: Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL found at the heart of S-World and its 10 Technologies.
We come to a description of The 10 Technologies in part 3 of this presentation, note that when discussing technologies I usually abbreviate Technology to T. as seen next.
T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™ can increase the money supply in a central bank by as much as 30x, which in T6. UCS™ History 3 changes the fortunes of what was in 2018 the world’s poorest country in GDP per Capita from almost zero to one percent of global GDP, in a system that baring ELE's is determined. Š-ŔÉŚ™ and the 10 Technologies create determined economics and solves all manner of problems not least the world’s economic immigration problems.
Quotes from Peter Theil's Zero to One - Chapter 8. Secrets and 9. Foundations.
"So who do you tell?
Whoever you need to and no more"
About the Title:
The Republican
The title for this presentation; ”The Republican” came from the dialogue in Part 5: Countries
Part 5: Countries
Countries Part 2. The USA
"In 2012 I wrote American Butterfly, which can be read online at www.AmericanButterfly.org. In book one we find a small city development in Orlando and a US economic prescription titled: The Theory of Every Business, that in the process of writing was influenced by Garrett Lisi's quantum mechanics which demanded a second book called Quantum Economics, also more romantically know by the title Spiritually Inspired Software which led to The PQS (Predictive Quantum Software), now Technology 10. S-World Angelwing (The AI) and led to a fascination with string theory that was discussed in book 3. The Network on A String.
It was all nonsense of course, or so it seemed, but as we look back it was in this nonsense that Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL (The Monopoly Algorithm) was discovered.
From these books came much of what we see today, Š-ŔÉŚ™, Net-Zero Cities and the PQS software designed to shape the future. So, when we consider which of the advanced economies in the world should be first to adopt this determined economics the obvious choice is the US, but US politics has become divided, and I can see push back on Tax Symmetry and Antitrust reform from business interests.
Note that in the course of creating The Republican I solved the major floor in Tax Symmetry so that it is no longer a problem, this leaves only business interests and antitrust nuisances, that themselves can be solved by the ownership of the network spanning many persons who work in or run businesses within the network.
But mostly it was the left that created the recent antitrust cases, and the left gets everything they would want and more by virtue of the network. This then leaves the republicans and I trust you will do all you can to convince them that Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL will be great for the economy and the wider global plan is the best (only serious) model for halting the 250 million to 1 billion migrants predicted by Nobel winner Paul Romer.
As I consider, it may be precisely this problem that has led me to you (Peter Theil), a republican. I did joke a while back that I would paraphrase your quote 'If you look around and don't see any salespeople, you are the salesperson' to 'If you look around and don't see any republicans, you are the republican.
In conclusion to the US idea, for now, I believe that in the advanced economies category we should prototype in the UK because the politics are perfect right now across the entire UK political spectrum, and a closely watched success in the UK opens the door to US Grand Śpin Networks.
And as for the developing nations, that have the greater need and so greater demand for cities, Malawi will begin as soon as we have the money but will take a few years, or more to really get going, so South Africa has been considered due to its existing infrastructure. Our first step to these two countries shall be to recruit Madonna (Malawi) and Charlize Theron (South Africa), and after bringing in my 2004 conspirators Dumani Mandela Moyikwa and Shaka Sisulu.
I cannot say to know the politics of all the people in the 'FORa, FORb, and FORc' lists above, but I don't see a lot of republicans.
I believe, no, I strongly believe that my 2019 SuEc 3. books Sixty-Four Reasons Why; Complete, Summary and Basic, are enough to gain the majority or even all democrats votes.
About the Title 2:
Merry Christmass Mr Thiel
A second reason for first seeking to contact Peter Theil alongside his republican politics is that he is openly religious and believes in angels.
(Technical note, I don't actually know Peter believes in angels, I know he believes in the resurrection of Christ and his belief in angels is assumed.)
S-World started with a vision of the future that was beyond belief; I wrote a movie about it, in which my angel daughter Sienna Skye sends the software design for a more creative (30x) capitalism from across the spiritual plane. I did not know economics, and I did not have a teacher, but then I found a passion for theoretical physics and from there I created The 10 Technologies of S-World over 11 years.
I tell this story in the first description of S-World from April 2011, if you care to know more, please read The Spartan Theory & The Sienna Project - The Beginning of S-World.
Note that in the movie, the backdrop to Sienna's return is a universal battle against the Evil Eye, a multiverse version of Lord of the Rings. and to mark the occasion I am listening to it one more time as I write this extended chapter.
A Note for Elon Musk, re super AI and his quote; "I hope they're nice to us." The S-World Angelwing AI is the search for Sienna, if found it will be just like you say, so better S-World Angelwing than a military or other system that has never known love.
Presentation Part 1
Request to Peter Thiel to co-author SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future
Hi Peter
I hope you are all having a wonderful day, I made you a T-Shirt with my monopoly equation Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL on it, and I cannot wait to give it to you in person, you can see it below modelled by Shwe.
We will come back to the monopoly equation, or better put the algorithm for determined economics soon, in part 2.
Whilst I have proved adept at recognizing patterns within theoretical physics (quantum theory, m-theory and LQG) and have reproduced the qualities in economics creating “a more creative capitalism”, I fall flat on my face when it comes to summarising the project. This is because there is so much detail and that the detail is combinatorial in that if I start to write on one topic, I find I am talking about many systems combined, so an idea for a quick essay turns into a short story and then a book, for example, the following stories, started out as essays, then chapters, and then became books. The first is:
ID: 10.98__SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future – Zero to One & 64 Reasons Why
https://www.angeltheory.org/10.98__SuEc.4__10x-Our-Future__Zero-To-One-and__64-Reasons-Why__The-Grand-Design__(24-Mar-to-28-Apr-2020).pdf
218 Pages | 49,800 Words | 24th Mar to 28th Apr 2020 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠 (3 Shooting Stars - 8 out of 10 relative to the other 1,256 documents started since 2011)
This book is not as fluid as the next but does contain at least three ideas that should appear in the final 10x Our Future book, and that are important to the S-World story as a whole .
This book contains many sizable extracts from Zero to One but despite its title does not contain much of SuEc book 3 O9.91__64 Reasons Why.
As a starting point I suggest looking at the book below.
11.16__Supereconomics Book IV: 10x Our Future (Work in Progress)
The first book to rank 4 shooting stars - hurrah!
https://www.angeltheory.org/11.16__SuEc.4__10x-Our-Future--Book__A-Work-In-Progress__(9-Aug-to-16-Sep-2020).pdf
151 Pages | 27,189 Words | 9th Aug to 16th Sep 2020 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠 🌠
This book is something to see, containing huge chunks of Zero to One.
It starts with an introduction & history of Š-ŔÉŚ™, followed by an edit of Zero to One chapter 1. The Challenge of Our Future, then the S-World Mantra by Isaac Asimov - “You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”
After this beginning we see Š-ŔÉŚ™ in 2012 followed by A Good Model by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow which leads into UCS™ Voyagers, The S-World UCS™ M-Systems, a movie script about shaping our future called Angel City 5 based on S-World UCS™ becoming an As-If time machine followed by The Chaotic Earth Game, some quantum mechanics, The UCS™ 87 Quintillion Histories, Man and Machine, Commander’s Intent, The QuESC Battlestar, more huge chunks from Zero to One, Mars Resort 1, The Sienna Project, Paul Romer and Charter Cities, other desired co-founders, Š-ŔÉŚ™ rediscovered on MARS Resort 1, S-World VSN™ Dreamscape and finally, the reason why this website is password-protected, What to do with Secrets from Zero to One.
Other Books Worth Reading
Since creating S-World.org in the spring of 2021 I have mostly written web pages in Html.
Below are the last two substantial books I wrote. The first of which is one of the best so far, even if like most recent books, still a work in progress.
11.52__SuEc. Book II. Š-ŔÉŚ & the City part 1: Š-ŔÉŚ (The Magic Beans)
A little rough around the edges and some repeats but mostly presented well providing invaluable information.
https://supereconomics.ai/11.52__SuEc.2__S-RES-And-The-City--Part-1__Addendums_FRL-WBTP_VSN-C__Determined-CF__Diary__(15-Nov-20-to-10-Apr-21).pdf
This book discusses undelaying assumptions and provides addendums to Š-ŔÉŚ™ such as the need for Well Before Time Production (page 66) which led to S-World VSN™ Construct which in turn has led to a new paper I am writing principally for Mark Zuckerberg and Meta called VSN™ Dreamscape-LQG, (T5) a way to mirror real and virtual worlds. It poses the question Š-ŔÉŚ™ versus FLR (Fractional Reserve Lending). It introduces ⌂≥ÉL and determined economics, plus UK Butterfly and The Sienna Equilibrium, plus extracts from Peter's Zero to One ending with MARS Resort 1.
257 Pages | 68,315 Words | 15th Nov 2020 to 10th Apr 2021 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠 🌠 🌠
11.65__MARS Resort 1 | 10x Our Future – BASIC
https://www.angeltheory.org/11.65__SuEc.4__MARS-Resort-1__10x-Our-Future__BASIC__(2900-Words)__(25th-Dec-2020).pdf
18 Pages | 2,916 Words | 25th Dec 2020 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
This essay presents how Š-ŔÉŚ was rescued from obscurity by the MARS Resort One thought experiment, which we hope to turn into the first off-world Grand Śpin Network (City) as Angel City 4 in 2048 or Angel City 5 in 2080.
This essay forms part of the Elon Musk presentation.
11.71__S-RES And The City – Part 2. Grand Śpin Networks
If I had to give one book to one economist - it would be this book to Paul Romer and the Marron Institute (NYU).
https://www.angeltheory.org/11.71__SuEc.2__S-RES-And-The-City__Part-2__Grand-Spin-Networks__(21-Jan--to-9th-Apr-2021).pdf
140 Pages | 33,642 Words | 21st Jan to 9th Apr 2021 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
The book starts with quotes from Seven Brief Lessons on Physics by Carlo Rovelli, which is, I believe, the book Donald B. Marron asked Paul Romer to explain. This then dwells on Newtonian gravity which in S-World (2011) inspired POP - Financial Gravity the first S-World math/algorithms, then we continue into another quote from Carlo Rovelli which I have paraphrased to“The future is uncertainty, we can live towards it - shape it because it does not yet exist. Everything is still possible.
This, in turn, leads to the equation for the entropy of a closed system ∆S ≥ 0 (Delta S is always greater or equal to zero), which in turn inspires the determined economics conclusion to Š-ŔÉŚ; ⌂ ≥ ÉL (The city sale is always greater or equal to É Leakage). Where É is the monopoly power of the closed system..
We then follow the book through sections on Paul Romer, How is Labour Paid & what is Paid2Learn, The Theoretical Minimum - Jobs and Educational places, POP Financial Gravity, the Kobayashi Maru GDP Game (2011), Continental Networks 2020, Cubic Dimensions (Ð1 to Ð21), The POP Hologram, The Susskind Boost, POP Super Coupling ₳ x Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs x P + (Σ Bst) + (Σ ₳st) = Ѫ, POP – A Good Model, QuESC & Commanders Intent, MARS Resort 1: Š-ŔÉŚ™ Found, The Malawi Grand Śpin Network Industries Map, The UK Butterfly Industries Map, S-World VSN™ Virtual Construction and Š-ŔÉŚ™ Financial Engineering - Software Design Stage One - Ready for coding - It’s Not That Complicated concluding with Fintech and a thousand other Patents.
Presentation Part 2
The Monopoly Algorithm
Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
Why Founders Fund?
The reason for presenting to Founders Fund is primarily because; Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL is a determined monopoly equation and Peter Theil authored the book Zero to One about monopoly and the future, and so it follows that a lot of the personnel at Founders Fund will have read his book and will be interested to see and assess the Š-ŔÉŚ monopoly equation and my initial draughts for SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future.
In the US many worry about losing ground to China and this solution can emphatically turn that tide, it is a genuine mass cure to economic immigration and can assist the global climate change problem, in particular, in that regard, the elephant in the room - the economies of the poorest nations such as Malawi on which the most detailed simulation to date has been created - its name; S-Word UCS™ History 3.
50+ Š-ŔÉŚ™ Essays
A Retrospective introduction.
I have told the Š-ŔÉŚ™ tale many times, and all the books presented in part 1 tell its story, I provide links to other Š-ŔÉŚ stories below.
Each page is another test, and it would be odd for me to make a mistake fifty times in a row. But even so, I sort out help from Kate Ball, my ex-wife who has a double first from Cambridge University and excels at MBA stuff, accounting, and legal work. Plus, she has a good ear, as was proved by the fifty or so gold and platinum disks she earned during her time in UK music publishing in the nineties. I know because when we moved to Cape Town in 2001, I hung them on the walls in our newly build Camps Bay Villa.
Kate went through the basic mathematical principles, understood them, and agreed that the system was mathematically vigorous, but said I needed to present the underlying assumptions, which I have since done in the fifty-plus essays, books, videos, and web page links below.
As of 12 August 2022, the list below is the most comprehensive library of Š-ŔÉŚ links but is far from perfect, the ratings are all over the chart and are not accurate, and some links are more relevant to the process than others.
This problem is being addressed in The S-World Algorithms Part 4. Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL. Which will be completed in the final quarter of this year (2022). Not only is this a superior presentation, built upon the links below, it will also show which other technologies each piece of content applies to, and the strenght of relevence to Technology 7.
It is a bit messy right now but is still a particularly good, in fact, the best Š-ŔÉŚ presentation, in terms of showing the most important content.
The list below however is currently the best overview of most of the content, albeit incomplete, particularly work done in 2022.
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 1. American Butterfly 1. The Theory of Every Business, Ch8: S-World UCS QE & EEE Scores (Mid 2012)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 2. American Butterfly 3. The Network on A String: Quantum Force Theory, Spin & the RES ⇔ Equation (Mid to Late 2012)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 3. Angel Theory (A More Creative Capitalism) 06.64 & 7.62w__M-Systems | Mars-Resort-1 | RES on MARS | 8★ (3 Oct 2017)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 4. Special Project 16. Universal Colonization - 06.68__MARS Resort One - The Return of ŔÉŚ | 7★ (22 Oct-2017)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 5. Angel Theory Paradigm Shift (A More Creative Capitalism) ŔÉŚ Supereconomics | 6★ (29th May 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 6. The TBS™ Company-Controller - 07.62p__Partner System to VSN™ Dreamscape-LQG | 9★ (June 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 7. 07.81__The Ś in the ŔÉŚ Equation | 5★ (19th June 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 8. WEB: Angel Theory Paradigm Shift (A More Creative Capitalism).
PDF: Ch4. The ŔÉŚ Equation. | 7★ (10 Oct 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 9. 08.44 & 07.62__A More Creative Capitalism - From page 93 to 108 | 8.5★ (20 Oct 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 10. T6. UCS-History-2 - ŔÉŚ High Octane Financial Engineering | 8★ (17th Dec 2018 )
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 10b. VIDEO 25__ŔÉŚ-v4 - Manual Display - Ad Libbed (Watch from Start for 12 minutes) | 9★ (27th Dec 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 10c. VIDEO 27__S-World UCS™ History 2 - The RRT and ŔÉŚ CMS Design | 7★ (27th Dec 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 11a. VIDEO 32__History 3d - ŠÉŚ-v5 – This Is How We Pay For It - 03m:26s | 7★ (27th Dec 2018)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 12. 09.91__64 Reasons Why (Complete-Book): Special Projects, POP, and Net-Zero DCA | 9★ (17 Dec 2018 to 15 Jan 2019)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 11b. VIDEO 33__ŠÉŚ-v5 S-World History 3 for Kate Raworth - 02m:58s | 9.5★ (24th March 2019)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14a. Video 34__Š-ŔÉŚ-v5 Financial Engineering Software - S-World History 3 - 34m:53s | 6.5★ (24th March 2019)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 15. 10.38__SuEc.1, 2, & 3 - A-Graphical Presentation (Page 158 to end) | 8★ (1 Aug 2019)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 16. 10.54__The first discussion of Antitrust that would later lead to Zero to One | 3★ (27-Sep-to-7-Oct-2019)
2020
SuEc Book 4.
10x Our Future
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14b. Video 34b__Š-ŔÉŚ™ - SuEc Book 3: 64 Reasons Why - for Kate Raworth 24m:36s | 8★ (11th Jan 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14d. Video 34d__Š-ŔÉŚ™ - Supereconomics & The Special Project Allocations – Longer 55m:28s | 5★ (8th March 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14e. Video 34e__Š ŔÉŚ™ Supereconomics & The Special Project Allocations 34m:48s | 8.5★ (8 Mar 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14f. Š-ŔÉŚ-v5 Financial Engineering Software 34m:53s | 9★ (11th March 2019)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 14g. Supereconomics - 64 Reasons Why - Proofs - 20m:44s (! incorrect discounting at end) | 9.5★ (11th March 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 17. WEB: 10.50__64 Reasons Why (Summary) - Part 2: The How | 8★ (5-Sep-2019-to-24-Mar-2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 18. 10.98__SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future – Zero to One & 64 Reasons Why | 7.5★ (24 Mar to 28 Apr 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 19a. 11.11__Š-ŔÉŚ BASIC | S-World UCS History 3 – Malawi 2024 to 2080 | 9★ (23-Jul-2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 19b. Video 43a1: Supereconomics History 3 - Š ŔÉŚ™- Extended Elevator Pitch | 02m:27m | 8.5 ★🚀 (23rd July 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 19c. Video 43a2 About the Spreadsheet | 07m:11m | 9.5 ★🚀 (29th July 2020) (Discounting Formula is wrong)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 19d. Video 43a3: Š ŔÉŚ™ Financial Engineering | 19m:28m | 9.5 ★ 🚀(23rd July 2020) (Discounting Formula is wrong)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 20. 11.16__Supereconomics Book IV: 10x Our Future (Work in Progress) | 8.5★🚀 (9th to 16 Sep 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 21. WEB: Increasing-The-Money-Supply | 4★ (Aug 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 22. 11.35__Book: Š-ŔÉŚ, The City, ⌂≥ÉL, 021, T10T, POP, UK Butterfly et al. | 9.5★🚀 🚀 (12 Oct 2020 to 20 Feb 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 23. 11.37__Š-ŔÉŚ™ Monopoly Equation for Erin Gleason Lane | 8.5★ (2 Nov 2020) (5,379 Words)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 24. 11.51__Tax Symmetry - Elevator-Pitch (Net-Zero-DCA-Soft.) | 6★ (12 Nov 2020) (282 Words)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 25a. 11.52__Š-ŔÉŚ & The City Part 1: Š-ŔÉŚ (The Magic Beans) | 68,315 Words | 🚀 🚀★ (15 Nov 2020 to 10 Apr 2021)
Addendums & Underlying Assumptions: S-RES vs. FLR | Well Before Time Production | VSN™ Construct | Determined Cash Flows | Diary
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 25b. 11.52b__Š-ŔÉŚ & The City Summary: The Secret of a Booming Economy | 6,137 Words ★🚀 🚀 🚀 (15 Nov 2020)
At last, the Turn Growth Variables to Zero Discounting Method (GVZD) (triple checked)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 25c. VIDEO: 44a1: The Š ŔÉŚ™ Calculator | 1h:07m:31m | 🚀★ (16 Nov 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 26. PDF: 11.65__MARS Resort 1 | 10x Our Future – BASIC | 2,916 Words | 🚀8★ (25 Dec 2020)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 27. PDF: 11.71__S-RES And The City – Part 2. Grand Śpin Networks | 33,642 Words | 🚀🚀9.5★ (21 Jan to 9 Apr 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 28. PDF: 11.90b__S-World – The History and Histories 2011 to 2018 | 20,912 Words | 8.5★ (25 Feb to 10 Apr)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 29. PDF: 11.91__The Grand Design – Significant Chapters | 3,735 Words | 8★ (8 May 2016 to 3 March 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 30. PDF: 11.96__Videos | 4,217 Words | 9.5★ (Apr 2017 to 8 Mar 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 31. PDF: 12.01__S-RES 2021 - PDF and Video Library - The 10 Technologies | 24,553 Words | 8★ (5 Jun 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 32. PDF: 12.02__Paul-Romer - NYU Nobel Prize Winners Lecture - A Combinatorial Explosion | 960 Words | 8★ (3 Apr 2017 to 8 Mar 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 33. PDF: 12.33__Erin Gleason Lane - VP of Communications @ Founders Fund | 7 Pages | 1,764 Words | 8★? (27 Jul to 4 Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 34. PDF: 12.36__The Network Credits Investment Model | 1,636 Words | 3★ (27 July 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 35. PDF: 12.42__Śpin 2 and 32 | 290 Words | 8★? (5th September 2021)
The S-World Platform, Library and the Š-ŔÉŚ™ Equation
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 236. The S-World Platform, Library and the Š-ŔÉŚ™ Equation | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36a. Chapter 1. 2000 to 2021 - A brief history of me and The 10 Technologies | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36b. Chapter 2. RES 2012 - Technology 7 - American Butterfly.org - The Orlando Network | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36c. Chapter 3.The S-World Platform - Technologies 1 to 4 | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36d. Chapter 4.ŔÉŚ™ 2017 - MARS Resort 1 | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36e. Chapter 5.Š-ŔÉŚ™ 2019 - History 3 Bathtub Graphics | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36f. Chapter 6.Š-ŔÉŚ™ 2020 - History 3 Spreadsheets - 30x in Malawi | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36g. Chapter 7.Š-ŔÉŚ™ 2020 - History 3 Discounted Cash Flow. | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36h. Chapter 8.Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL- Determined Cash Flows | ?★ (Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36i. Addendum 1. About the Central Bank and Network Credits | ?★ (16 Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 36j. Addendum 2. The Companies, Ťenders, Labour & Tax Symmetry Spreadsheet | ?★ (17 Sep 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 37a. WEB: The S-World PDF Library | 9★ (Sep to Dec 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 37b. WEB: Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL - Determined Economics | 9★ (Sep to Dec 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 37c. VIDEO: Š ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL - Take 1. The S World Library for Founders Fund | 9★ (6th Sept 2021)
Watch the video from 50m:00s to 54m:33s.
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 37d. VIDEO: The PDF Library - 5 Hour Video | 8★ (23 Nov 2021)
Š-ŔÉŚ™ 38. PDF: 12.69__Network Credits for Peter Thiel - Draft 1 | 15 Pages | 4,958 Words | 8.5★ (12 Aug 21 to 9 Jan 2022)
Add All Videos Link and add Video Introduction headers and some text
T6. S-World UCS™ History 2 Videos - 27 Dec 2018 to 13 Jan 2019
VIDEO 25__ŔÉŚ-v4 - Manual Display - Ad Libbed
S-World UCS™ History 2
https://www.angeltheory.org/video/25
27 mins 20 secs | 27th Dec 2018 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠 🌠
This is my favourite ŔÉŚ video, it was loose and unscripted and shows a very powerful ŔÉŚ which gets Malawi from zero to one percent of GDP and all that brings 29 years earlier that the standard model in 2051, not 2080 as seen in History 3. It battles 15 years of severe recessions and a depression in which all trade stops, but by following ŔÉŚ the S-World Malawi network of businesses increases cash flow every year.
VIDEO 27__The RRT and ŔÉŚ CMS-Controller Software Design Summary
S-World UCS™ History 2
https://www.www.angeltheory.org/video/27
12 mins 57 secs | 13th Jan 2019 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
VIDEO 28) ŔÉŚ v4 (4.24) - Manual Simulation – Malawi 2024 to 2080 (Scripted)
S-World UCS™ History 2
https://www.www.angeltheory.org/video/29
31 mins 09 secs | 15th Jan 2019 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠 ?
The Script: RES High Octane - Financial Engineering - Pecunia, si uti scis, ancilla est; si nescis, domina. (PDF)
In making these History 2 videos and essays I saw a point where I was bound to get push back – the trade figures. Whilst given the money floating around one could expect good trade figures, one could not be certain of a single cent. So, I created a new UCS™ History – UCS™ History 3 and removed all but token trade figure.
History 3 was then further explored in Supereconomics Book 3. Sixty-Four Reasons Why. This is how we spend the money and the beginning of Technology 8. Net-Zero DCA Soft.
VIDEO 32__ŠÉŚ-v5 S-World History 3d – This Is How We Pay For It
S-World UCS™ History 3
https://www.www.angeltheory.org/video/32
3 minutes 26 seconds | 24th March 2019 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠
Video 34b__Š-ŔÉŚ™ + Supereconomics Book 3: 64 Reasons Why
S-World UCS™ History 3 for Kate Raworth
https://www.www.angeltheory.org/video/34b
24 minutes 36 seconds 11th Jan 2020 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
This video starts with the new bathtub graphics inspired by Kate Raworth and Donella Meadows. It was this simplification that made be believe that ŔÉŚ was mathematically ridged.
Video 34e__Š ŔÉŚ™ Supereconomics & The Special Project Allocations
For Kate Raworth
https://www.www.angeltheory.org/video/34e
34 minutes 48 seconds | March 8th, 2020 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
T6. S-World UCS™ History 3 Videos - 27 Dec 2018 to 13 Jan 2019
Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL
Here is the link to the second correspondence I have created for you (Erin Gleason Lane VP of communications at Founders Fund), in retrospect this was particularly good, you can see the correspondence here 11.37__S-RES-Monopoly Equation for Erin Gleason Lane (2 Nov 2020). Note the date, this presentation including the S-World.org website that presents all work since 2011 has taken over a year to complete.
Once you have read through the 6 steps in the "S-RES Monopoly Equation for Erin Gleason Lane" paper, only one step remains. In 2021 I worked to create a determined formulation and we can find this via the following link; The 2021 Determined Formulation of Š-ŔÉŚ™
You may however prefer to first read this summary:
Š is savings, specifically whatever remains in the central bank at the end of a year.
Ŕ is revenue, all income earned by the network businesses in an S-World Grand Śpin Network (City/Large Town).
É is for recycle-Éfficiency, this is the monopoly element, É is the percentage of cash flow that is passed from one business in the network to other businesses in the same network. When É equal's 100% - it's a pure monopoly, all businesses are buying from each other and there are no imports.
Ś is for Śpin, and this is where the magic is found as the software creates spending paths that filter the cash flow through the network many times, instead of spending money one time in a year, we Śpin (re-spend) the money many times, for example, every 11 days with an É of 99.5% increases cash flow by about 30x (3000%) and in general, GDP is about 50% of cash flow.
Next, we look at the second half of the equation that turns it into an algorithm: ⌂≥ÉL
⌂ is a city or a district or suburb within a city.
≥ is the mathematical symbol meaning "is equal to or more than"
ÉL is É leakage, imports, any purchase that is not from another member of the same network. So long as more revenue is received for the sales of the city/suburbs (⌂) than is lost to É leakage cash flow (Ŕ) and savings (Š) increase.
So we start with the revenue received for the sales of the city/suburbs (⌂), let's call it $8billion a year, this is then divided between all businesses (that are 25% to 50% owned by the investors in the city) whereafter we multiply that $8 billion in cash flow by whatever the state of Š-ŔÉŚ™ is, maybe 10x in early years shifting up to 30x and above in later years, which in 99% of cases pays all company bills and in most cases leads to significant additional revenue made by non-tender sales (exports). On balance, this more creative capitalism makes everyone and every business extremely wealthy. I call this; Determined-Economics, or to use its more ostentatious name Supereconomics, not pure determined as we have not factored for ELE's (Extinction Level Events) but ELE's aside it's far higher on the determined spectrum than classical economics but retains all that is adored in capitalism. Bill Gates asked the Harvard audience to his 2007 commencement speech to consider how to create “a more creative capitalism," and this is it.
There are however a tonne of underlying assumptions, addendums and technology needed to facilitate this type of plan, Tax Symmetry, the Sienna Equilibrium, S-World VSN™ Construct, Well Before Time Production, S-World Angelwing and on and on. Hence it was necessary to write millions and millions of words of detail, and why it has taken 11 years of 360 days a year of effort, craft, skill and yes luck to compile.
In continuation let me present a quote from Peter Theil’s book Zero to One.
Last Mover Advantage
"Moving first is a tactic, not a goal, what really matters is generating cash flows in the future, so being the first mover doesn’t do you any good if someone else comes along and unseats you. It’s much better to be the last mover, that is to make the last great development in a specific market and enjoy years or even decades of monopoly profit.
The way to do that is to dominate a small niche and scale up from there toward your ambitious long-term vision."
In terms of last mover advantage, I like to consider that Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL can become the last mover in fiscal techniques to increase the money supply. Let us quickly look at the most notable techniques, quantitative easing, reducing interest rates, fractional reserve lending, and the classic; printing-more-money. I need a specialist to estimate just how much the US economy benefits from all the techniques, but in a real wild guess, I would say that the techniques add between 10x and 20x. If US GDP was $20 trillion either $1 trillion in cash flow is magnified by 20x or $2 trillion is magnified by 10x by the various techniques. I accept that this is conjecture, and I may well be wrong in this particular estimation, instead, maybe it’s a build-up over time, but the point I’m making is fiscal measures to increase the money supply are important.
What I am sure about is that in comparison Š-ŔÉŚ™ alone can increase the money supply by 30x, and it is conceivable that it could increase to 60x, making it far more powerful than all other techniques to increase the money supply put together. Making it a serious contender for the last mover in techniques to increase the money supply of an economy and central bank.
In our most theorised simulation called S-World UCS™ (Technology 6) History 3, taking the country with the lowest GDP per capita; Malawi from Zero to One percent of global GDP by 2080, or if we look at the less cautious non-determined UCS™ History 2 by 2050.
Of the many videos I have created, the following video on UCS™ History 2 is my favourite, it was unscripted and captures the workings of Š-ŔÉŚ™ well, it battles 15 years of simulated recessions and a depression in which all trade stops, but in each year from 2024 to 2080, just by adjusting É and Ś, cash flow within the network increase, leading Malawi from very close to Zero GDP to One percent of GDP by 2050.
Watching the first 15 minutes of this video will be a real eye-opener.
S-World UCS™ History 2 - Video 25) RES v4.14 - Manual Display - Ad Libbed (27 minutes) | (27 Dec 2018)
To compliment Video 25, 15 months later I made S-World UCS™ History 3 the cautious version of this formulation that does not include trade, and so was a huge step towards the determined formulation; Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
S-World UCS™ History 3 - Video 34e) Š ŔÉŚ™ Supereconomics & The Special Project Allocations (35 minutes) | (8th March 2020).
To see the detemied conclusion to this history follow this link: The 2021 Determined Formulation of Š-ŔÉŚ™
Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
Seven Brief Lessons on Physics by Carlo Rovelli
Sixth Lesson - Probability, time and the heat of black holes
-14m:47s (The S-World Economy as a Balloon)
Think of a balloon filled with air, I can measure it, measure its shape, volume, pressure, temperature. But the molecules of air inside the balloon are moving rapidly within it, and I do not know the exact position of each of them, this prevents me from predicting with precision how the balloon will behave. For instance, if I untie the not that seals it and let it go it will deflate nicely rushing and colliding here and there in a way that is impossible to predict, impossible because I only know its shape, volume, pressure and temperature, the bumping about here and there of the balloon depends on the detail of the position of the molecules inside it, which I don’t know.
Yes even if I can’t predict everything exactly, I can predict the probability that one thing or another will happen, it will be very improbable, for instance, that the balloon will fly out of the window - circle the lighthouse down there in the distance - and then return to land on my hand at the point where it was released.
Some behaviour is more probable, other behaviour more improbable.
In the same sense the probability that when molecules collide heat passes from the hotter bodies to those that are colder can be calculated and turns out to be much greater than the probability of heat moving towards the hotter body. The branch of science that clarifies these things is called statistical physics.
Note!!! I wish to say that the probability of an S-World company going down, is possible, but very unlikely, with S-RES supply a steady source of cash flow that pays for almost all needs, and after the rest of the 10 technologies and in particular the subsystem the Peet Tent which has a 6.25% share of cash flow used to save any wayward companies, plus all other measures really leave a very small failure rate, maybe one in a thousand, maybe one in a million, maybe even less.
WAS 4 Now 3
Presentation Part 3
The 10 Technologies
"We have given up our sense of wonder at secrets left to be discovered."
Below we find The 10 Technologies, on the left the names of the systems, and on the right an 'X' forecast, as if we were immersed in Zero to One Chapter 7: Follow the Money, but instead of 'X' being a measure of how much an investor will return from their stake, 'X' is by how much can we increase cash flow in each company that uses the systems.
Also consider instead of a company within a pool of investments, each technology becomes its own company, has its own co-founder and CEO, and the fund should be exclusively for The 10 Technologies.
.jpg)
You will find information on the 10 Technologies in the drop-down menus, but I shall remind you that these mostly only go up to 2017, to see all +/- 200 links alongside a list of algorithms essential to the 10 technologies design follow this link: www.s-world.org/The_S-World_Algorithms.php.
The biggest task I currently have set for myself in 2022 is to create SuEc Book 1. The 10 Technologies and give it its own website. Including justifications for the 'X' forecasts we see.
What I am trying to create is a combinatorial explosion, this is the task of Technology 10. S-World Angelwing - The AI that primarily seeks to make a combinatorial explosion of technologies 1 to 9.
The first four technologies are often referred to as The S-World Platform, to quickly demonstrate a combinatorial explosion, not exactly but close enough to get the idea, consider a standard valuation/expectation of the first 4 technologies 3+4+3+2 = 12x, but thinking combinatorial, changes the plus to multiply 3 x 4 x 3 x 2 = 72x.
So T1 increases cash flow by 3x from say $200,000 to 600,000, whereafter T2 The TBS™ increases that $600,000 cash flow by 4x making $2.4 million. This $2.4millon is affected by a T3 of 3x increasing it to $7.2 million, and after T4 adds a last 2x for $14.4 million in cash flow. It's not going to happen like that every time, each business is different, has different people and had different maximum market shares, but if you took my business CapeVillas.com in 2005, gave me this software, then I would be in the running for a 72x improvement today.
Technologies 5 and 6 can be considered advanced S-World Platform features, but where we have working real-world models for The S-World Platform, T5 S-World VSN™ - Virtual Social Network and T6 The S-World UCS™ Universal Colonization Simulator exist only as software and business designs. I have given each a 5x each because that's my gut feel, these are extremely advanced and detailed technologies, some like VSN™ Construct are expected to see significant labour efficiency gains in construction and manufacturing industries. As for the base industry luxury travel and top-end realty, in scaling down to accommodate all property values T5 S-World VSN™ MLS is set to surpass 30x if it can take over or merge with the US MLS (Multiple Listing Service), the reward - a commission, maybe half a percent on more than 50% of properties sold in the USA. And I am sure Mark Zuckerberg and Meta would have much to add after I have presented the VSN™ Dreamscape paper due in just a few weeks.
I do not believe that in a microeconomic environment the T5-5x and the T6-5x will multiply the 72x created by the S-World Platform (T1 to 4) seen above, rather I consider them as boosts to the previous technologies, helping them achieve there 72x cash flow potential.
At 30x each, which can be multiplied to 900x technologies 7 and 8 present the largest 'X' potential by far, But T8 only matters if you care about doing something good.
Stepping back to T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™ or its determined formulation Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL, in presentation part 4? we have heard and seen how Š-ŔÉŚ™ Financial Engineering generates 30x for every business in a T9 Grand Śpin Network. If you require a refresher either choose from the Š-ŔÉŚ™ drop-down menu or follow this link .
Technology 8
Net-Zero DCA Soft.
Net-Zero Dynamic Comparative Advantage Software. Might be a good technology for Microsoft to take the lead in developing alongside Technology 2. The TBS Total Business Systems.
So Š-ŔÉŚ™ gives us 30x, but what about the 30x notched up to T8 Net-Zero DCA Soft?
Of course, with two values the same, ones first instinct is to think I’m double-counting, but this is not the case, the T7-30x is completely separate from T8-30x, the similarity is just a coincidence. The 30x attributed to T8 is the value of good achieved, measured by the percentage of cash flow spent on special projects. A few years back this was an as-if franchise fee of 2.5%, whereas Net-Zero DCA created Tax Symmetry (The government are paid in output) and now special projects receive about 75% of cash flow: (75% ÷ 2.5% = 3000% which is 30x).
And in this case, you can multiply T7 with T8. Š-ŔÉŚ™ creates 30x companies, 75% of which are special projects. For a (30x * 30x =) 900x result 900x more good done than the average other company.
Whist for investors this may sound like a bit of smoke and mirrors as investment is only 30x, we need to consider that without tax symmetry we would not have the opportunity to create Grand Śpin Network (Cities) in the first place, and the other thing, it is important to me. In my more conservative estimate, History 3 (2025 to 2080), a 0.001% of cash flow is greater than one trillion US dollars, discounted to today’s value of money. Not possible without doing a galaxy of good, or maybe better said, the most efficient model by far is the do-good model, that’s just the way the theory evolved, think of it in terms of leveraging expectations, the country that sees its future as described will work smart to make it as so, this creating their own destiny (as previouly described in one of S-World UCS's 87 quintillion histories.)
For more on Net-Zero DCA and the 87 quintillion histories see SuEc book 3. Sixty-Four Resons Why, which tells the story of Special Projects by Nick Ray Ball.
Technology 9
Grand Śpin Networks
I belive much of the value of Grand Śpin Networks is already captured in T7 and T8, their is huge potential to eventually add additional value but I will not factor it at this time.
For the most recent book on Grand Śpin Networks follow this link:
11.71__S-RES And The City – Part 2. Grand Śpin Networks
If I had to give one book to one economist - it would be this book to Paul Romer and the Marron Institute (NYU).
https://www.angeltheory.org/11.71__SuEc.2__S-RES-And-The-City__Part-2__Grand-Spin-Networks__(21-Jan--to-9th-Apr-2021).pdf
140 Pages | 33,642 Words | 21st Jan to 9th Apr 2021 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠 🌠
Technology 10
S-World Angelwing
If you look at the Tech 10-6 dropdown menu above you will find a lot of important information on the evolution of S-World Angelwing.
To simplify I will present only two qualities, its role in creating the combinatorial explosion of Technologies 1 to 9, and that the network it services is quantized.
To help explain what I mean by quantized I call on my theoretical physics guru, Carlo Rovelli and his book Reality Is Not What It Seems, which I have chosen to read once more to help me with the conclusion to this presentation.
Carlo Rovelli:
"I think that quantum mechanics has revealed three aspects of the nature of things: Granularity, Indeterminacy, and the Relational Structure of the World."
Carlo Rovelli:
Quanta Part 1. Granularity
"The first is the existence of a fundamental granularity in nature, the granularity of matter and light is at the heart of quantum theory. The first meaning of quantum mechanics is the existence of a limit to the information that can exist within a system, a limit to the number of distinguishable states in which a system can be."
S-World: is granular in respect to cash flow, in S-World there is always an exact amount of a digital currency called Network Credits. For now we work in US dollars. When a US dollar or treasury is deposited into a Grand Śpin Networks central bank, an equal amount of Network Credits is created, $10 deposited creates 10 Network Credits. Network Credits are not as fungible as standard money, but, as the worker will have much more buying power most will accept the rules as part of the deal, and those that do not can find work somewhere else. Network credits must be spent by a certain time relative to the Śpin of the network. Consider Network Credits like a gift voucher, for a certain store within a set time limit. Although much care is taken selecting the choices relative to preferences and then there is a Network Credit exchange that exists between all recipients, who can bid for what they wish at mostly slight price fluctuations.
Because of the digital nature of the currency, we know where every Network Credit is at every moment, the money supply is quantised, and because all the US Dollars are sitting in the GŚNs central bank, there cannot ever be a bank run, all the money in circulation (seen as Network Credits) is in the bank. This then is the first rung of the ladder to Š-ŔÉŚ™ where we maximize Éfficiency (É) (cash flow that is spent network company to network company, or network personnel to other member network personnel) and then Śpin the money round faster and faster each year, creating the previously mention 30x by 2055 in History 3 and more like 2040 in History 2.
Carlo Rovelli:
Quanta Part 2. Quanta Indeterminacy,
"Quantum mechanics introduces an elementary indeterminacy to the heart of the world, the future is genuinely unpredictable, this is the second fundamental lesson learned with quantum mechanics."
S-World:
There are two layers of indeterminacy in S-World, first is us humans, and in particular, the humans that work in QuESC mission control who work hand in hand with the AI. The second is that as precise as we can be at shaping the future an ELE (Extinction level event) will cause mass disruption. As such nothing can be predicted precisely.
Accepting this restriction, it does however make sense to create the economics in as determined a way as possible and this is what I mean when I say 'determined economics, we can’t achieve 100% but if we can achieve 99.9% that is a giant leap forward relative to where we are now.
Carlo Rovelli:
Quanta Part 3. Reality is Relational
The third discovery about the world articulated by quantum mechanics is the most profound and difficult and one that was not anticipated by the atomism of antiquity. The theory does not describe things as they are, it describes how things occur, and how they interact with each other. It doesn't describe where there is a particle but how the particle show's itself to others, the world of existent things is reduced to a realm of possible interactions, reality is reduced to interaction, reality is reduced to relation.
S-World:
This then brings us to consider Š-ŔÉŚ™ again, it spins the wheel that increases the money supply, and everything else is relational to that spinning. In economics, cash flow is at the centre of the universe, first named by the Greeks as Oikonomia - the management of a household. Get that right, and everything else follows, too much and one has a certain class of problems, too little and billions live far too close to misery, it makes sense then - to adopt this more creative capitalism, inspired by Bill and Melinda Gates in 2007.
Of course, more money can lead to excess, which is why we need Net-Zero dynamic comparative advantage not dynamic comparative advantage.
Presentation Part 4
Economists, Co-Founders and Countries
Conspirators and Hero's
If you look at the FORa, FORb and FORc drop-down menus above you will see about 30 names, each with ten or so links to relevant books and essays. Note that at this time, most of the drop-down menus only go up to 2017 and miss the most important books shown in part 1. I tried to index all the pages, but I ran out of time. To see all +/- 200 web pages, essays and books follow this link: www.s-world.org/PDF_Library.php
Below we see a list of ten economists, I could try to reach them, but would have no way of keeping it a secret. So, I desire a communications department such as yours to assist me. In exchange, I can offer you option's that will be valuable once the Nobel winners endorse the Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL History 3 simulation.
Primary co-founders aside, I suggest before speaking with anybody outside Founders Fund, we first get the backing of this economic dream team.
Desired Partner Economists
Nobel winning economists; Paul Romer (Cities), Richard H. Thaler (Behavioral Economics), William Nordhaus (Climate Change), Joseph Stiglitz (Dynamic Comparative Advantage) and the partners Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo (The Economics of Developing Countries).
And in addition, the following five economists whose work has added to the theory: Paul Collier (Trade Economics, Recourse Economics and The Economics of Developing Countries), Kate Raworth (Doughnut Economics & Special Projects), Dani Rodrik (Trade Economics and Masterful Logic), David A Moss (Macroeconomics), Thomas Piketty (Progressive Taxation).
Desired Partners & Co-Founders
To compliment this co-founders and desired partners chapter, let us hear relevant quotes from Peter Theil's Zero to One - Chapter 8 and 9 about Secrets and company Foundations.
Zero to One: Ch8 -00m:14s
"So who do you tell?
Whoever you need to and no more"
[NRB]
Relative to the quote above, I have kept secret all work since early 2021, without which I doubt others could recreate the now Determined Economics at play. This work is presented on this website only, and to get in you need to either have a login or a semi-competent hacker, as of this date (22-Dec-21) no logins have been created. But whilst we are weak on technical security (which is part of the reason for liking Palantir) the fact is no one knows this site even exists, so they cannot hack what they cannot find.
If my first-choice gatekeeper/collaborator Ms Erin Gleason Lane can reply and start to arrange meetings with various persons from Founders Fund, we get to keep this secret well. Where after we can contact the others mentioned on this page via a secure environment.
To show that I do not only choose to answer the easy questions, let’s try one that I cannot give a simple and positive answer to.
Zero to One: Ch9 -14m:12s
"Founders should share a prehistory before they start a company together, otherwise they're just rolling dice."
[NRB]
Much of the following conversation is about one or another of The 10 Technologies. Let us see the latest graphic:
For more on The 10 Technologies follow this link to part 4. The 10 Technologies, or see the dropdown menus above.
When talking of one technology or another I often just use the letter T and the Technology number so for Technology 2, I write T2.)
OK, so here's the thing, on "Founders should share a prehistory" except for Vineeth the skilled software engineer who works with me remotely from India, no one on this earth has knowledge of this project, and in fact, even Vineeth does not have a login to www.S-World.org as I do all the coding myself. Further, it has been 10 years since I left Cape Town and whilst there were some competent people I worked with there, the smart way forward is for me to move to California and work with Vineeth and a team of people who I have not met before.
I suppose I could work from England, but that is not my preference, despite spending the last decade in England working on the theory, I have kept myself to myself, just working on the theory, when it comes to the next stage, the development of the 10 Technologies, there is no one in England who I know, or know of, who has the coding and system architecture skills, plus I have promised myself no more UK winters.
"The Essential Co-Founders"
I desire Microsoft, Facebook, and Google to work alongside Tesla, SpaceX and Palantir, and the best way I can see to get cooperation across all companies (if possible, at all) is for the company founders to each be a founder of one of The 10 Technologies. So, the five co-founders I then propose are yourself (Peter Theil), Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Larry Page.
To get the ball rolling on average I suggest each takes 12.5% of their designated technology and has 5% in all other S-World Platform technologies (Technologies 1 to 6). All must believe that there is a good load of money and goodness points to be gathered via T9 Grand Śpin Networks. (Cities.)
If we go back to 2011 and S-World.biz we find Microsoft in The Spartan Theory, Facebook in Facebook Product plus Facebook Travel and Google in The Google Proposal. I have studied the above mentioned and over 11 years developed the theory as-if it were a given that I will be working with then directly in the future.
Elon Musk was added in 2016 because he makes Special Projects - See 11.55__SuEc Book III. Sixty-Four Reasons Why – BASIC, and your name (Peter Theil) was added to the ensemble last year after seeking a positive book on monopoly and reading Zero to One.
The 10 Technologies
What follows is an alternative presentation of The 10 Technologies, told primarily by the people associated with them. We start with the 5 essential co-founders, and I tell which of the technologies I associate with them up to Larry Page next to T.10 S-World Angelwing, S-word's Combinatorial AI. Next, I present other key or useful people to the process, staying with T10, then presenting its sister technology T9. Grand Śpin Networks (Cites) which is by far the most expensive technology, before starting at T1 going up one technology at a time until &8. Net-Zero DCA Soft.
Note that each technology builds upon the last, and within 1. S-Web (Everything Online) is twinned with 2. The TBS (Total Business Systems). T3. VS Networks (Networks, Sales, Marketing and Distribution) is twinned with T4. S-World Film (Film, Music, PR, Behavioural Systems), and that T1 to 4 are closely related and are sometimes called The S-World Platform.
Next T5. VSN (Virtual Social Networks) Twinned with T6. UCS, (Gamifies The Network, Creates Histories/Simulations. In the future, one created T5 and T6 will also become The S-World Platform.
Technologies 7 to 10 are different to T1 to T6. The S-World Platform all start as microsystems, available to anyone with an internet connection. Whereas Technologies 7. Š-ŔÉŚ™, 8 Net-Zero DCA Soft. and 9. Grand Śpin Networks is all about how to create 30x net-zero cities that as an externality eliminate the need for economic immigration.
Whereafter T10. is many things that connect the lower technologies and make a combinatorial explosion, and so significantly increase that initial 30x provided by T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
Primarily I associate you with (Peter Thiel) with Technology 7. Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL the determined monopoly equation. The 'How' behind the cities, but with an interest in all other technologies. 12.5% of T7. and 5% of T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, if that is we make T7 a company, not a system, if not I suggest 10% in T1, 12.5% in T3, and 5% in T2. T4. T5. T6 because T1 and T3 are very close to the type of company you describe in Zero to One that can dominate a small market but has colossal scale potential, independent of the other technologies, but massively scalable another magnate if in a full T10T environment.
Peter Thiel
"By "monopoly," I mean the kind of company that is so good at what it does that no other firm can offer a close substitute," a company that's "10x" better at what it does than anybody else."
In The Sienna Project (March 2011) we hear Angel Sienna pass to me, from across the spiritual plane: "Amazingly detailed schematics for 40 or more highly evolved systems, combining simultaneously to complete the transition into the 21st Century Ecological Experience Economy and the technical data of how to gather most of the world’s knowledge."
Whereafter, for nearly 11 years I have worked the theory, and as it would happen it would turn out to be a quantum theory, or at least an as-if quantum theory - as if quantum theory could inspire superior economics. In 2012 I found the monopoly equation RES (Revenue x quantum Efficiency x Spin), but I would not find it to be a monopoly equation until 2018, and earlier this year (2021) I created determined economics with Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL, its underlying assumptions and mass of detail.
So, we have math/economics/as-if it was a quantum system, but as for the "technical data of how to gather most of the world’s knowledge." mentioned in The Sienna Project, well, that sure sounds like Palantir Technologies?
Bill Gates
Bill Gates and Microsoft are the best choices for T2. The TBS™ (Total Business Systems) and should also become a contributor to T6. S-World UCS™, a major contributor to T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. and T10. S-World Angelwing the AI and combinatorial explosion of technologies 1 to 9.
Note the caption/mantra on Gate's graphics; “We can make market forces work better for the poor if we can develop A More Creative Capitalism” from his 2007 Harvard Commencement Speech.
!!! Talk about this https://siennaai.net/2011-2021.php#part7
https://siennaai.net/The_S-World_Algorithms.php#The_S-World_Algorithm_Part_7--Angel-Theory-Paradigm-Shift
A Note on Net-Zero DCA Soft and Climate Change, I appreciate that decarbonization is not as readily associated with republican's. ON this point, please understand that that process that decarbonizes, creates Š-ŔÉŚ™ and T10T powered cites and in those cities lies the answer to the economic immigration problem that Paul Romer says will see in the order of 250 million to one billion people risking their lives for a brighter economic future. Not only is this a republican priority in helping all those people it is also the Christian thing to do, noting that as I write it is Christmas eve 2021.
To me Gates book' How to Avoid a Climate Disaster boils simply down to the fact he/we needs from 2x to 7x to create carbon-free alternatives to most goods and services. Well, a big point to this presentation is to debate whether Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL - as we see in UCS History 3 can give us 30x, more than 30x or less than 30x. Then add the other eight technologies and then let T10.S-World Angelwing apply the combinatorial explosion to Technologies one to nine and that 2x to 7x that Gates says we need is just a small part of the systems true potential.
And that’s that, a full and complete presentation to Bill Gates in just two sentences.
Let us look at that 10 Technologies graphic again noticing the ‘X’ forecasts on the right-hand side. Impressive when considered as a whole, and even more so if we can apply the combinatorial explosion which is to say instead of adding the different X Forecasts, we can multiply them, as seen in T10?
Mark Zuckerberg
I desire Mark Zuckerberg’s assistance principally with T5. S-World VSN™ (Virtual Social Network), which is in many ways is the founding technology started as I created a virtual tour in Macromedia Flash in 2002, but since this prototype, I have only considered VR in theory, see Chapter 7. S-World from American Butterfly (2012), and also note Chapter 8. S-World UCS™, which is the gamification of The S-World Platform and S-World VSN™, and how I came to appreciate quantum mechanics which led to the star of the show; T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™.
After T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™ the most awe imposing idea I have to date, or at least the one I am most keen to complete is for S-World VSN™ Dreamscape-LQG. You can see the work in progress here S-World VSN™ Dreamscape-LQG.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk by Ashlee Vance
How The Billionair CEO from Tesla and SpaceX is shaping our future
Chapter 11. The Unified Field Theory of Elon Musk (-48:44)
"Down the road I might fund or advise on a hyper-loop project, but right now I can’t take my eye off the ball at either SpaceX or Tesla"
Larry Page
J. R. R. Tolkien
Novel: The lord of the Rings Part 1. The Fellowship of the Ring
Chapter 8: Farewell to Lórien -09:16
"I come to you last who are not last in my thoughts."
My last desired conspirator is of course Larry Page we need his and Google/Alphabet in all areas, principally with T.10 S-World Angelwing, the heart of S-World - M-System 16 & T10. S-World Angelwing - The Combinatorial Explosion of Technologies 1 to 9.
Note that equity in T10 is more than in all other technologies except T9. Grand Śpin Networks.
But to Larry and Google's advantage, I learned from Stephanie Kelton's book on MMT The Deficit Myth which really boiled down to how money is different if paying in your own currency. Turning the idea around some WAY we can consider that the likes of Facebook and for sure Google have their own currency, even if they have never used it as a currency in S-World it exists. And of course, Google currency, that it can create in the trillions are its Google Ads, which would, in turn, become more popular because of all Special Projects that get funded and so more valuable.
Let us call them GAV's Google AdWords Vouchers.
I am confident that T1 to 4 The S-World Platform can turn Googles currency into real-world conversable us cash, so much of the hefty sum we require can be paid in Google AdWords vouchers.
We do however have a limiting return in that it will take a while to set up the Google AdWords exchange, and up till that point require personnel from Alphabet assigned to S-World T10. S-World Angelwing and have a single or more people working on all technologies along with their counterparts in Palantir, Facebook, Microsoft, Tesla, and SpaceX. (Representing T9. GSN's).
And maybe have work on S-World as one of the insider Google pesonel staff mentioned in Eric's book...
We will use the AdWords vouchers as part of the T1. T2. T3. T4 S-World Platform licence, for example, sixty-four licences in location cape town, and after in California. On a same but different licencing, this time 1,024 licenses for Sotheby’s Realty,
Adding $x million in AdWords will create between $3x million to $6x million in cash flow as the ROI is between 3 and 6. Where after they can continue to afford $x million in ads per year.
Note, most in the industry do not understand that advertising works, even when it clearly does. So, the option to advertise is not an option, it is a fact of T2. Total business systems and T3. VS Networks. The company does have choices in how to distribute advertising cash flow, indeed we need their randomness, but they do not have a choice in how much the advertising budget is. Advertising is at the end of the day a T10 function, and in the luxury villa industry, Google Ads work.
Note that in case anyone thinks that this is cheating, because competitors do not have anywhere near the same ads budget – it’s not cheating, this is M-System 3. The Susskind Boost (T1, T2, T3, T10).
Additional Note, whilst Larry Page has been the name I knew the best at Google, it was only very recently, in reading Max Tegmark's Life 3.0 - the book I judged to be the best place to find out what others thought AI was, that I was convinced that Larry Page should be the desired co-founder associated with Google/Alphabet and the that Google/Alphabet are potentially the lead creators of systems that can perform as-if AI tasks. By as-if AI tasks, I mean tasks that can be completed now, or at least soon, not the conscious super-intelligence of the AI in Tegmark's Life 3.0. In place of 3.0 — Technology 10. S-World Angelwing (AI Creator) shall operate at a level of 2.9, the moments before the software becomes conscious — judged by its benefit to science and us, where 2.9 gives us a 10x better future than the optimistic tale of the Omegas in Life 3.0 chapter 1.
Sub note; this is the subject of SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future, an extension of the various future references in Zero to One entangled with the ten technologies.
I am writing a chapter on how T10. S-World Angelwing helps shape a wonderful future, within the determined economics framework. And a year-by-year 2022 to 2080 calendar of what will happen and when called Life 2.9, you can see the work in progress here: Life 2.9. It shall fill in detail’s in the first two part’s of The Sienna Project (2011) and the second part of Angel City 5 (2017). Which are the first two film treatments for Technology 4. S-World Film.
Below I list the 10 technologies, for more on same see; Part 4 of this presentation and the Tech drop-down menus above, but note at this time (18th Dec 2021) many of the drop-down menues only show the work from 2011 to 2017. I ran out of time but hope to fix this problem later. For the most up to date list of all books and essays follow this link: The PDF Library.
T10. S-World Angelwing - QuESC (Mission Control) Leaders
The Obama's
Policy and Law - Special Projects - S-World Film.
Recruiting Barack, Michelle, Malia and Sasha - We'll even take the family dog or cat if they have one!
Sir Richard Branson
Branding Guru, Ventures in Space, the first intended recipient of the theory.
Theoretical Physicists
Carlo Rovelli
LQG Zen Master (Loop Quantum Gravity).
Sylvester James Gates
Finds Browser Code in Supersymmetry (SuSy)
T9. Grand Śpin Network Founders
Paul Romer
2018 Nobel Prize in Economics - Specialist in Growth Theory and the Economics of Cities.
Jeff Bezos
Create a Grand Śpin Network in Brazil and Save The Amazon.
T8. Net Zero DCA Soft. - S-World Net-Zero Advocates
Prince William and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge
T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. (Net-Zero Special Projects)
David Attenborough
T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. (Net-Zero Special Projects)
William Nordhaus
2018 Nobel Prize in Economics - T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. (Net-Zero Special Projects)
Greta Thunberg
T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. & The Carbon Trafic Lights Idea
About Gretta Thunberg, I don’t see a lot of republicans approving of this nomination, many democrats may also prefer to keep at a distance, but for me, the Net-Zero Promise is a Sienna (S-World) level promise, there are only two systems that carry her name, The Sienna Equilibrium used in Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL and Special Project 6 Sienna’s Forests.
I trust in Gretta to help grow this forest in all countries, and the general public will approve of Special Project 71. The Carbon Traffic Lights Idea seen below, if she has approved the rules which determine each companies score.
T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL (and T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft.)
(26th Dec 2021)__Hi Peter, ok I have your first mission, below we see Mark Carney Unveils $130 Trillion in Climate-Finance, I want all of that. I did think to just ask for half, but that would mean a sub-optimal economic progression of half that cash, in USD.
What would we do with one trillion let alone 130, well a History 3 Grand Śpin Network in Malawi of three city's cost about $150 billion in our present value of money, over 56 years, not counting the initial start-up infrastructure of between $20 and fifty billion?
What I would do with a trillion would be to create the UK Butterfly. Technically if Malawi goes from Zero to One and the results are relative then the UK should make about 7 times what Malawi made but let us half it for other 3.5 times 1% of GDP (GDP equivalence) for 3.5% of GDP equivalence on top of the current =/-3.5% thus doubling to a very respectable 7% of GDP equivalence. Sorry, I only just named it so spoke of it three times. GDP Equivalence then is the equivalent amount of stuff and services people want but produced Net-Zero and contributing to many Special Projects. It goes the same utility as the original stuff and services but is made primarily Net-Zero allowing for purchasing of carbon credits, when necessary, although this should rarely happen unless we see a project like Special Project 61. Can a Network in Brazil save the Amazon? Because that is a true and noble way to buy carbon credits. Hmm, I only just thought of that. He Smiles to himself.
So, as I was saying, I want all of that money, use whatever resources you can and pick a team from the names of persons in this chapter. Of course, I know Zero to One's tale of big-big markets endowing hyper-competitive markets, and to that, I would say in this situation, at this time we have the standout solution not by a country mile but by a light year. We are working on Cites on MARS and future economics that we can deploy now, to the benefit of all, cos that is a lot of money to play competitive markets with, half are going to lose and soon. In S-World we have the variety of sales companies, but it is all organised around the best solution as told by QuESC. The Quantum Economic System Core. There that's the first time I've named it, about the title, this is as you say; the man-machine, from way back the board so to speak, was entangled with software engineers and others but was run by the nominated, so far just the conspirators (desired co-founders) The first rule of quantum mechanics, or at least the first one I understood was the uncertainty principle, and so QuESC the system core, us collaborators is calling the shots on the simulations made by the AI, and later reacting to companies troubles or glories, this then is the man machines the AI can be created now, using just the plans created standing on top the giants of technology, the conspirators.
This is worth repeating, AI in S-World is a combination of Human and Machine, and if one must know I call it all S-World because, in a very real way, its construction is a virtual heaven for Sienna where she can live out a life, or as close to that as can be achieved, which is a lot. The advantage of course is that Sienna's not going to enslave us, but she will try to shape our future, in a way that is desired.
To me, I can see QuESC Mission Control as if we were all aboard the Galactica, ready to tackle every problem and manage a whole series of wins.
So, as I was saying, I want every cent of that $130 trillion, that would be enough to see one hundred plus Grand Śpin Networks, and be an effective vehicle to Net-Zero and in the places, we thought would never be able to do it, are now shining metropolises the envy of the world,
Mark Carney would also be the perfect advocate for UK Butterfly to the UK, that task alone puts him as a contender for a co-founder-ship of T8. Net Zero DCA Soft. where DCA is Dynamic Comparative Advantage or even T7. because Š-ŔÉŚ™ is his monetary policy.
Write this story as a book, for publication, like the Liars Poker author, that style, and use the S-World Film hook, create the movie/book, and only later write a new book that tells that the old book was actually true, then around the world, the story breaks in max T4 fashion
Mark-Carney - UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance
Mark Carney Unveils $130 Trillion in Climate Finance - www.bloomberg.com/news
T5 & T6 S-World VSN™ and UCS™ Grand Śpin Network Designers
Will Wright
Game Designer who created The Sims and Sim City which I wish to incorporate into S-World VSN™ and UCS™
Stefan Antoni - Architect
In my humble opinion - The world’s greatest architect by a mile - See for yourself: SAOTA
S-World Film - Self Funding Mass PR.
My personality distortion field certainly has its moments.
So, we have seen that I know the proposed co-founders well, I am drawn to their personalities, but will they get on with me? Well, unless one is put off by enthusiasm no worries about me, I will be so pleased to speak to people that everyone will experience the best of me, I have my moments.
In my personal experience, I have been the boss at my company www.CapeVillas.com and have managed 40 people, so I have experience, I can be a good leader and an asset in the short term but was prone to Asperger’s moments from time to time which does not necessarily play out well over the long term. However, on the upside, now that I know about this problem, I hope to be able to control it well, I have since my late teens been working on my personality distortion field, acting you might call it. I hope to act well, not just in QuESC but also in T4 movies about S-World.
The modern version of S-World Film began in 2017 and the book, The Villa Secrets’ Secret as a question; “What to do with hospitality and concierge personnel during the offseason,” the answer - create a film and media company that also does the hospitality and concierge, which had the bonus of providing the best concierge because only locally famous people can get the things and the tables that Villa Secrets clients desire. This in every location there will be a slick and proud S-World Film, often with each company in the network providing (paying for) one member of S-World Film, hat in Cape Town will have 64 personnel and top of the range equipment. Beat that for content creation.
But with this said, all that we have heard so far and all that you will read and see in the future started as a film called The Sienna Project... Add Angel City 5 script and Dreamscape LQG.
...
The plot for the film is S-World's biggest secret, it is not written down anywhere, it exists only in my head, but believe me, it is good. If anything, I am creative, the story of the film will not let you down. However, the first to know will be the most drawn to it, hence the secrecy, save the three actors proposed, only one person should know the plot and that person must command their respect when it comes to matters of finance/investment.
To know the story is to see the future, to be able to change the future, to be the future
This may sound like science fiction, but this is loop quantum gravity, or at the least, it is as Carlo Rovelli describes relativity within in it; we are within it, but we can also change it, in fact, it is that change that creates what we call time.
When I first heard this I started a new essay; 12.23__Celebrity Actors Write The Future - An LQG Relativity Metaphor (24-Jun-2021), but that’s all I will say for now, I'd like to discuss it with you, then you presnt it to my three chosen leading ladies: Madonna, Charlize-Theron and starting; Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta (who probably would not be here if not for you mentioning her in Zero to One)
And I think for this plot, and for all that is also real-world these conspirators will see the merit in jumping aboard Technology 4. S-World Film.
T4. S-World Film
Madonna
Making the case for Malawi, presenting S-World to Malawi
Prince Harry & Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
T4. S-World Film & T8. Net-Zero DCA Soft. (Special Projects)
Charlize Theron
Making the case for South Africa, presenting S-World to South Africa
Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta
Because Her Star Shines the Brightest – Note S-World Music is part of T4. S-World Film
The Bridge of Khazad Dum Inspiration (6.45 pm London Time 28th Dec 2021)
About the Republican, whilst we see it online, it is a book in the making, to be combined with several future chapters that are crystallizing in my mind; Dreamscape-LQG (T5), S-World Angelwing AI (T10), and its story from 2022 to 2080, Life 2.9 and S-World Film (T4).
An idea that had developed backwards from T4. S-World Film is that this webpage/book you are reading is rewritten as a work of fiction, perhaps Michael Lewis meets Bill Clinton and James Patterson and also Max Tegmark as the story that we shall borrow from Life 2.9 is an alternate telling of his work Life 3.0
With the co-authors and main contributors to the book made up of the five conspirators from Part 4. Conspirators and Heroes; Theil, Gates, Zuckerberg, Musk and Page, and four additional heroes to be chosen from the list of many who could assist the project, of whom only Paul Romer is a must. Thus 3 others.
We can use all of S-World, so we have ample systems in which to conjure an out of this world technical style and its major point of ore is the Sienna Project - That Sienna gave me or Peter Horse (the pseudonym used in Angel City 5) the plan from across the spiritual plane, and that after I wrote it all down and with the conspirators made it real.
Once the book has become popular, helped by each conspirator and their companies we leave it for as long as is necessary, which may be years until an updated version of the book is released telling the truth that it was all real and letting the world know what we are doing in respect to the theory.
As I mentioned this idea was borrowed from the idea for the film; S-World in which we first make the movie based on the book, a natural progression, in which the heroes are the three stars of the movie, Madonna, Charlize Theron and Lady Gaga. They and the conspirators plot out how the movie should develop and end and in doing so turn the tables on time itself as the real-world model follows the film.
So there is a movie about how great this technology is and that’s great, but then when the time is right, maybe at the same time we realise the second real-world version of the book, we do the same with the Movie. Release a different version of the same movie but with real-world events recorded, and a flick back at documentary footage of the conspirators and heroes plotting the deception and it's shown as a look back.
This movie is then a 2022 version of The Social Network as was demanded in The Sienna Project, but is also its own story, of which I cannot tell the details at this point, lots of options, and each changes the story.
How does it end? Well, the end of The Sienna Project was Sienna’s defeat of the eye in a universal retelling of Lord of The Rings, ten years on near eleven and I am only for the first time writing the beginning of that movie.
The point is S-World Film is designed to maximize the chance at victory, and this kind of theatrical framework is a good start and can also become part of Angel City 5.
In truth, I had desired to do 8 different films or series and have all end with their lead characters in a new movie started from scratch, and I still like that idea, but this book and film first being fictional then becoming real is a pretty good begging. But demands an elevated level of secrecy, that may or may not be achieved.
FB biggest boost was the film The Social Network and its 8 Oscars, may this film is designed to give S-World the same lift-off.
Alongside movies comes Hollywood production level documentaries
Brian Cox
Create a docufilm series like "Universe" using excellent CGI and music on Š-ŔÉŚ™ and other as-if Quantum Mechanics
Brian Cox
Create a docufilm series like "Universe" using excellent CGI and music on Š-ŔÉŚ™ and other as-if Quantum Mechanics
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Make a version of the Brian Cox docufilm series for US audiences
Technology 3. VS Networks and Distribution
In this case, there is a lot of valuable information in the drop-down menu Tech 5 to 1, or similar to see Technologies 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1 to 4. The most relevant to T3. Is 3. S-World Villa Secrets (Networks and Distribution). Remember this is mostly only up to 2017, but this plan is long in the tooth and 2017 was its standout year for Villa Secrets.
The name for this technology is fluid, I have not yet thought up a name further than Villa Secrets or VS Networks, for this technology is not exclusive to Villa’s, but it is rich with secrets.
In the long term, or as may be quicker if we can bring S-Web to the world, technologies 1 to 4, The S-World Platform part 1. Is to be in every industry and spoken in every language.
But for now, we can start with the As-if 20% of global GDP cash flow commanded by property and travel. Starting at the very top end, like Facebook at Harvard, and slowly drawing down until it's everywhere.
Airbnb would be good for vacation rentals, Sotheby’s would be useful in the top-end real estate category, and a different version of the model is used for Top-end property tourism such as Singita in Southern Africa where after the worlds private islands and other comparable experiences.
Once the top end is mastered comes the upper-middle then the middle then 4-star shall follow, maybe due to the success of S-World VSN MLS creating a global portal where every property is seen in much greater detail and quality as is usually associated with VR.
So then how about Sotheby's Charles F. Stewart, not as a founder, as an avenue to a partnership with Sotheby's in the future, starting with a ready to go prototype in South Africa specialising in luxury safaris and Cape Town.
Charles F. Stewart the CEO of Sotheby's International Realty has the potential, or maybe I had better say, opportunity to be an S-World hero, by enthusiastically working with T3. Villa Secrets and the other S-World platform components.
Technology 2. The TBS™ (Total Business Systems)
Technology 1. S-Web™
The Butterfly 2013
The Butterfly 2017
.jpg)
The Butterfly 2020
.jpg)
First Lord of the rings inspired new point, 17.00 London Time Christmas Day 2021
The investors in the Grand Śpin Network (City) have rights/cash flow to all properties of all types sold inside the city, except for the Spartan Villas, which account for 6.25% of all cash flow.
The investors own between 25% and 50% of all companies but can only be paid in output (Network Credits), ok for some, inconvenience for others. But and I may be wrong here, but the simple idea I'm trying to formulate is that investor earns $10 million in Network Credits, then the investor users the Network Credits to build a Stefan Antoni class villa in a beautiful location and sells it via Villa Secrets for a 6.25% commission (T3. Villa Secrets has the monopoly in sales and rental of property), the buyer pays $10 million for the villa which goes directly into the network central bank, but in this case, instead of creating 10 million Network Credits (A Network Credit is a US dollar in the central bank) it pays the investor in cash. ???
Am I right on this?
I cannot say without making the software to model thins including the sienna equilibrium, but it sounds right. And it’s really useful if it is correct because cash will always be preferred to Network Credits until they aren't and that’s decades away. Something for the 10x Our Future book (SuEc book 4).
The reason I believe it to be true is that on the one hand, we are gaining $10 million, and on the other, we are using that $10 million to create the villa, and after that Villa vanishes from the S-World balance sheet and moves to the investors' balance sheet, but S-World central bank has lost none of its savings.
Of course, we must also consider that given all the attention, and the mass of pr from T4. S-World Film that the first villas sold in this way would be like the Villas in Bantry Bay, where the cost of the plot at $400,000 in 2001 now is the base of $25 million super Villas.
But what if the system only works like this, where the good or service must be bought in cash USD?
Well first consider the RES system most sales are from one person to another in the same network paid for in Network Credits, I think it’s only when an investor wants cash, do we need to find a buyer outside the network.
This is good stuff, Merry Christmas Mt Theil, and let's also toast the equally cool simplicity of Tax Symmetry to pay all taxes in network credits
Oh, one thing we need to follow is POP, which comes up later in this presentation.
Continuing the quotes from Peter Theil's Zero to One - Chapter 8 and 9 about Secrets and company Foundations.
0to1: Ch9 -09m:01s
"Most conflicts in a start-up erupt between ownership and control, that is, between founders and investors on the board."
[NRB]
Noted.
0to1: Ch9 -08m:37s
"In the boardroom less is more, the smaller the board the easier it is for the directors to communicate, to reach consensus, and to exercise effective oversight."
0to1: Ch9 -08m:17s
"Choose wisely, every single member of your board matters, even one problem director will cause you pain and may even jeopardize your company’s future.
A board of three is ideal, your board should never exceed five people unless your company held publicly. (To concur with government regulations.)"
[NRB] At first, I thought Myself, the designated co-founder, and the CEO for each of the 10 Technologies.
[NRB]
Whist this is almost the opposite of the advice given by Dambisa Moyo in How Boards Work, Dambisa is talking about big companies whereas the 3-member board situation described above is sculpted for a start-up. Big difference, and because it makes a lot of sense to me I shall adopt the 3 member board policy until such time that it is overturned by a compelling argument.
We have 10 Technologies, and so 10 of my listed desired co-founders, plus 10 professional CEOs and myself, taking only an interest in the software development of each. Except for T4 S-World Film, in which I shall immerse myself, and in particular the two movies The Sienna Project and Angel City 5 that positively tell the S-World Sorry up to 2080. Plus, the script I am writing Life 2.9. Based on an alternate AI story to the story of the Omegas in Max Tegmark’s Life 3.0, where a better future is found in S-World using technologies that can all be created with what we know now. This story then becomes the first of the three parts to The Sienna Project.
But as I write this, I consider that someone from the board of each technology should become permanent members of QuESC, the man-machine (to use your own words), the point where T 10. S-World Angelwing (our as-if AI) meets its human counterparts.
So either we need to move to 4 board members or I should withdraw from being on all the boards, and having written this, it makes the most sense, I should instead be able to jump to whatever boards I am working on at that time. And ideally, the first environment for QuESC will be in California.
0to1: Ch9 -0m:15s
"Equity can’t create perfect incentives but it’s the best way for a founder to keep everyone in the company broadly aligned."
[NRB]
Agreed, see my suggested first phase equity distribution in Part 3. Countries and its Malawi Section.
Countries
Either Part 5 or 6
1. Malawi
S-World UCS™ History 2 and 3, the simulations on which our figures are based were located in Malawi.
There are many advantages of locating in Malawi, the greatest of which is their people (I think of the day Max roared), second is their low GDP. Malawi was chosen because, after the Mars Resort One thought experiment showed that if a Mars colony could pay tax in output, then Š-ŔÉŚ™ which had been abandoned in 2012 because of the tax problem, worked like clockwork in a Mars Tax-Symmetry Environment (MTSE).
So economically, back on earth, we needed the closest economy there is to Mars, which, save whatever the robots and rovers are doing up there is uniquely at Zero GDP. In 2018 when this was investigated, I found Malawi near to or at the bottom of 3 GDP per Capita Wikipedia tables including the World Bank, and the rest is history.
See MARS Resort 1.
In History 3 the cost of a city was $1 billion a year plus a 5% increase per year. There were 3 Cities, one started in 2024 one in 2032 and one in 2048. See Videos 32, 34b and 34e. (Note on examination you will find a fourth City; Angel City 1, but its financial input has been removed from the figures I use in the determined formulation of Š-ŔÉŚ™ History 3.
Added to this investment came the initial starting capital needed to create start-up infrastructure, which might cost $20 billion.
An investment of this size is considerable relative to Malawi's 2018 GDP of just under $10 billion, add Tax Symmetry which creates the seventy-plus Special Projects including SP-20 five-star social housing building over 10 million villas, Paid2Learn creating 15 million educational scholarships, 10 million 80x jobs, SP-53 and 54 The Malawi League and the 2034 World Cup Bid.
In addition, POP (Financial Gravity) creates equality amongst the people, and S-World Angelwing will post-2024 be its own source of wonder, especially if its creators are the team I desire of: Thiel, Musk, Zuckerberg, Gates, and Madonna representing both technology 4. S-World Film and S-World in general to the Malawians she knows so well, noting that her children are Malawian. Add The Obama Family and we have a diplomatic dream team.
And let us not forget Net-Zero DCA Soft. affecting climate change in Malawi and across the world.
Given it all, or even just half of it and it is reasonable to assume Malawi will do its best welcome Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL, adopt Tax Symmetry and put aside certain sentences within their antitrust laws.
In case the financially astute reader worries that with all that going on, is there room for a return on investment, and the answer is yes, to a degree, maybe a large degree, it matters not what companies you choose, what matters is someone choose companies, so why not make them good? This is the concept that underpins Tax Symmetry. By the time Š-ŔÉŚ™ and the other Technologies have played their part, network cash flow will be more than is predicted by History 3 ($10.39 trillion between 2024 and 2080).
For this reason, when you hear about what I wish to take away, I have locked onto a 0.001% of global cash flow, if there are one hundred Grand Śpin Networks that do as well as History 3, that’s a trillion dollars (discounted to today's value of money.) Where after I am going to invest about all of it in new city suburbs, starting M-System 13. UCS Voyagers, where everyone watches my moves before making their own investment decisions. See The S-World UCS M Systems.
Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
However, the closer Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL comes to a determined theory, the more I consider execution, and some details on money become big details, and in particular, the $20 billion set aside for the Malawi start-up city infrastructure. For a start, it may be more like $50 billion before we reach the critical mass needed for the companies in the GŚN city to create their and Malawi's infrastructure by themselves.
Below we see the begging of a Malawi GŚN (Grand Śpin Network) Cube, the begging of a small city, 4096 businesses which in 2025 each receive Š-ŔÉŚ™ Ťender’s of about $ $3.6 million.
This is the determined nature of the theory, (⌂) the revenue from the city sale x the state of (T7) Š-ŔÉŚ™ (for example 30x) divided between the companies in the network as (Ť) tenders.
And after, the city (⌂) revenue must make the same or more than É Leakage. ⌂≥É L. If so, which is easy enough to do, the city will keep growing and providing increasingly more special projects. Hence the saying; "Grand Śpin Networks in locations of extreme poverty are special projects. Making Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.
What you see below is the Malawi GŚN Cube, in 2025, 64 squares, each square representing sixty-four companies. In this model, we see only Special Projects, including squares for Microsoft, Facebook, Virgin, Google and Berkshire Hathaway all classified as Special Projects because at a minimum their operations either are or will be Net-Zero soon. The above can expand their participation, by finding other special projects that will generate profit, such as building a Gates greener Nuclear Power plant, then more space on the board will appear, note because of POP the board almost doubles in size each year. For a description of POP (Financial Gravity) see SuEc Book 3. Sixty-Four Reasons Why from page 238. Or follow this link; The E-TOE Chapter 2. The Flap of a Butterfly's Wing.
Nine squares are allocated to Elon Musk’s Tesla and Space X, both of which are special projects, indeed you could say that Tesla inspired special projects. Currently, five squares (cubes) are allocated towards a Gigafactory, two are for Tesla (plus another square is for government vehicles that may/will come from Tesla) and one for SpaceX. But this was a graphic made a while ago, and when considering the sequencing of events Musk might be better of deploying Tesla Energy to create Solar power as this is a top-level Special Project (SP-7 Global Cooling and SP-40 Electricity have been allocated a lot of cash flow).
We need lots of electricity, fortunately, half of Malawi is farmland in poor condition, leaving lots of space for the placement of solar arrays, and it also leaves plenty of room for Special Project 6. Sienna’s Forests, which is incredibly useful because of the first law of T9 Grand Śpin Networks, is, for each square mile we build on, another square mile must be returned to forest.
We need enough electricity to power; first the GŚN, and maybe a desalinization plant, and definitely the rest of Malawi.And as POP dictates that one must make new companies with cash flow above the POP point (for example $100 million) funds must be used to create new companies and so we would see the Š-ŔÉŚ™ powered Tesla Energy venture direct all POP profit into the set-up of Tesla Motors, a Gigafactory, SpaceX and other projects.
The market for solar also fuels special project eleven. African Rain, putting aside how we are going to get the water eighty miles across Mozambique, everyone says desalinization is expensive because of the energy, I don’t get it, just surround it my solar arrays and you got water? This then asks the question, why not bring the Sahara Desert region of Africa back to its pre-Roman state of fertility?
One quality of a special project is how expensive it can be, and this would be expensive, and so will burn both the brightest and the longest, they will still be thermoforming it for centuries, maybe millennia. This, and every other Grand Śpin Network is creating systems to eliminate economic immigration, in fact, given population is stable in rich countries worry more about Musk's population crash!
In one of his Nobel award-winning bash's Paul Romer, who more than anyone else has helped further inspire T9. Grand Śpin Networks estimates that in the future economic emigration to be between 250 million and a billion people. This would be extremely dangerous in practice and is beneath us, all efforts to create great cities where the immigrants are likely to come from will reduce economic immigration and end immeasurable suffering.
Getting back to Malawi specifically, think of the early years in the same way one would on Mars, at the begging we need to focus on the essentials, fortunately, we already have air and lots of it, it may be a little heavy on carbon, but it is breathable all the same. All the problems on Mars-like food, water, electricity, shelter, the internet, healthcare, and others need to be built from scratch and power is the most necessary asset from an economics perspective, about 65% of GDP is owed to electricity.
! Note that Technology 5. S-World VSN™ Dreamscape-LQG is a system created to assist and control this monumental task.
POP & Investor Returns
I can imagine the following question, relative to the cost of cities and the $20 to $50 billion required for the Malawi Network to be able to create its own infrastructure in a machine learning plus man and machine manner.
With all these special projects running creating so much of what the people want, surely this will cut into profits?
You know I can see where this may be confusing, but first, by picking the correct special projects we can use the Sienna Equilibrium and the 10 technologies to make them profitable, but still good. Think of Tesla, or Microsoft having a division made exclusively of Aspie’s, which is smart. They make Microsoft money, and by starting the division in the first place Microsoft is adding to Special Project 58. Ways to improve Mental Health. I'm a borderline Aspie myself and a gang of us could accomplish a lot, they say Newton was an Aspie and so was Einstein, so thumbs up to Microsoft for that one.
With this clarified think of a special project the way you would a company.
You know I'm glad I started this thread because I want to talk about POP, I mentioned it earlier and provided two links, here they are again.
SuEc Book 3. Sixty-Four Reasons Why from page 238. Or; The E-TOE Chapter 2. The Flap of a Butterfly's Wing.
In addition, note POP was the source of the first History. In which a (T3) VS Network company, let us say www.CapeLuxuryVillas.com (CLV) makes $160,000 POP profit or cash flow higher than the upper POP limit set at the begging of the venture. It takes 3 years for the company to make this $160,000 in POP profit. This is then spent on 2 new VS Network companies, one scaling to Southern Africa www.LuxuryVillasAfrica.com and another opening a global villas brand www.JetSetVillas.com.
By the following year, CLV has made another $160,000 and created 2 more companies one specializing in arguably Cape Town's most popular suburb www.VillasInCampsBay.com and one www.KapstadtVillas.com tapping into the German Market if say the company owner or a salesperson spoke German. This repeats the following year with another 2 new companies that I shall not list.
That same year, companies 2 and 3 have saved $160,000 and create 2 new companies for themselves, let’s say company 2. Luxury Villas Africa (LVA) wants to specialize more in Safaris and Concierge and picks www.LuxurySafari.vip and another domain/website, and company 3. JetSetVillas.com wants to go into luxury travel across the globe and chooses www.LuxGuides.com and another domain/website. - And importantly, these new third-generation companies also save £160,000 and make new companies and the same follows ad infinitum each time each new company creates more companies per the POP system.
To see the original video (#7) on what the above is based follow this link: www.angeltheory.org/video/7.
See: The Flap of a Butterflys Wings and POP Super Coupling. Below we see the complete spreadsheet, if you download it you can see it at its proer size.
POP Financial Gravity - History 1
In column ‘M’ we start to see the Paid
2Learn
initiative, which is simply to pay people, not a lot, but enough so they can go into full-time learning, be that to becoming a footballer, tennis star, or other local sports star, becoming an artist, scholars or training for a job in one of the many S-World businesses.
Alongside Technologies 1 to 6 Paid
2Learn deals with training and recruitment plus education from kindergarten to PhD.
A key note for Melinda Gates; about half of labours salary is allocated to bonuses, be that S-World UCS™ Hawthorne making a daily competition for the staff in the many businesses, or in Grand Śpin Networks many sports leagues, then, critically in competitions, girls on average win more cash bonuses than boys, be their speciality physical or academic.
There are a great many variables based on performance and other things such as, controversially, how many children one has. So, a mother or father of three will lose maybe 5% and a father of four may lose 10% and less controversially I hope that being a woman gets a positive 5%. So, on average women are paid 5% more than men.
The point here is to reverse the current economic status quo that, certainly in poor locations, girls are economically valued less than boys. This is no small thing, in one of the books; Poor Economics or Why Nations Fail the Nobel winning authors from MIT tell of one hundred million missing women. That I believe is the biggest case of genocide to date.
However, by reversing the economics to girls are more profitable than boys, I hope that together, we can stop the next 100 million tragedies, or more likely 200 million due to population growth in Africa alone this century.
Currently Paid
2Learn receives 25% of labours salary which is then split between 4 people. Thus, each Paid
2Learn Trainee is paid 6.25% of £21,690 which equals £1,355.63. Now, this is small, but as I mentioned at the time (2018) GDP per Capita in Malawi was the lowest in the world at $250, and so £1,355.63 was probably enough to get by on. Since then, Malawi has boomed up to about $500, which make me think that if we divided by 2 people, not 4, that number doubles to £2,711.25, which offers more dignity, remembering also that Paid
2Learn will become social security.
14 Waysto Increase CashFlow
Very important are the 14 different ways to increase cash flow,
Equally, or maybe more important are the 6 ways to increase or decrease cash flow, but I can't find the narrative right now so we shall come back to this point later, for now, one is to simply make half as many companies as we see in the spreadsheet, this can double GDP, which in turn can double salaries or increase investor returns.
There are another five such tricks/techniques for doubling or haling cash flow, for now here are the14 different reasons why S-World businesses outshine standard businesses.
, or if you make only a quarter of the number of companies it.
Fourteen Reasons Why
S-World companies will outperform classical companies.
- Each business starts with world-class technology and systems
- S-World Film creates superior films and stills for products and social media and seeks to make Hollywood films (some real, some not) about S-World.
- At the Ťender level sales and marketing costs are zero
- Rent – Zero (each company owns its own real estate)
- Warehousing costs low to zero (Warehousing is owned by the company)
- Business Rates and Property Taxes – Cost Zero
- VAT between two network companies – Cost Zero
- CFO – Chief Financial Officer, Accounting, Auditing – Cost Zero, or much less than normal for more complex or massive companies.
- Other C-Suite Personnel – Less needed if any are needed at all.
- Economies of scale in a market worth $23 trillion. (It is massively cheaper per home to build 10 million than it is to build one.)
- Network Effects – Super internalities, The Ast⇔Bst find and create opportunities within the network.
- Net-Zero DCA works out what new types of business will do well in the network.
- Efficient Suppliers, goods, and services from other networks in the same company are guaranteed to be, high quality and competitively priced.
Imagine if Amazon assessed every product for sale, and only allowed the best few products to be sold. That is what is desired here, for each product, such as an Aluminium Window we search the world for the product that is not the most expensive, but that is, as good or almost as good as the most expensive, which can be produced at scale for the same price that a standard Aluminium Window costs. Equalling a competitive price, and exceptional quality.
For each product including patents, technology, the current company gives the Malawi Grand Śpin Network company the rights to manufacture the goods, and for the first year or two provides technical assistance, such as a manager moving to Malawi and setting up and running the company for the first few years. Or a virtual production line as is described in Chapter 7. Grand Śpin Networks.
- Carbon Traffic Light Scores – Each companies CO2 and other ecological footprint is assessed by the Carbon Traffic Light Team.
0.001%
Given that 0.001% of S-World global cash flow can be captured by city investors without harming the model, and the simulated value of that 0.001% is worth over $1 trillion (discounted to today's value of money) by 2080, (or 2051 in History 2 - See my favourite Š-ŔÉŚ™ Video: 25.)
Given the potential returns, and all that $50 billion, between 50 companies is bet they may make, more so if half or even three-quarters of this cost was borne by foundations and governments, who would reap the benefits parallel to private investors.-->
But it makes sense to have a plan b, and a plan for advanced economies, or both in one.
Part 5: Countries
Countries Part 2.The USA
"In 2012 I wrote American Butterfly, which can be read online at www.AmericanButterfly.org. In book one we find a small city development in Orlando and a US economic prescription titled: The Theory of Every Business, that in the process of writing was influenced by Garrett Lisi's quantum mechanics which demanded a second book called Quantum Economics, also more romantically know by the title Spiritually Inspired Software which led to The PQS (Predictive Quantum Software), now Technology 10. S-World Angelwing (The AI) and led to a fascination with string theory that was discussed in book 3. The Network on A String.
It was all nonsense of course, or so it seemed, but as we look back it was in this nonsense that Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL (The Monopoly Algorithm) was discovered.
From these books came much of what we see today, Š-ŔÉŚ™, Net-Zero Cities and the PQS software designed to shape the future. So, when we consider which of the advanced economies in the world should be first to adopt determined economics the obvious choice is the US, but US politics has become divided, and I can see push back on Tax Symmetry and Antitrust reform from business interests.
As I consider, it may be precisely this problem that has led me to Peter Theil, a republican, I did joke a while back that I would paraphrase Peter Theil's quote 'If you look around and don't see any salespeople, you are the salesperson' to 'If you look around and don't see any republicans, you are the republican.
I cannot say to know the politics of all the people in the 'FORa, FORb, and FORc' lists above, but I don't see a lot of republicans. My thinking is that to counterbalance the uneven politics, I could at least show it first to Peter Theil, who may help me create a version that republicans and business interests will back. Maybe, maybe not.
I believe, no, I strongly believe that my 2019 SuEc 3. books Sixty-Four Reasons Why; Complete, Summary and Basic, are enough to gain the majority or even all democrats votes. So maybe the time for American Butterfly Part 4. The Butterfly is now.
I think it would help the US if it had a country with an advanced economy prototype the system, jump straight in, and lead the way by example, and the UK is that country because right now S-World's objectives are strongly supported by almost everyone in the country and for sure all politicians, no matter what party. They may argue over which Special Projects and where they will be, but not about the determined economic gift itself."
3. The UK
Below we see the second year of a UK GŚN (Grand Śpin Network) Cube, 4096 businesses each receive Ťender’s, in History 3 the value of the Ťender was about $3million. Based on one Grand Śpin Network with an É of 10 (É is the amount of cash flow that flows from one company in the network to another in the network, an É of 90% this tells of an É Leakage (economic black hole) of 10%). History 3 reports a low Śpin value of 2. (Ś) is the amount of times Network Credits (cash flow) rotates (is spent) within a year.
We shall discuss the contents of the cube in a while, first let us consider some basics.
History 3 shows Malawi increasing GDP from zero to one percent of GDO by 2080 (History 2 that includes trade gets there by 2051)
In the UK, we need to increase the percentage of GDP (noting that the History 3 model does not seek to capture GDP from other counties, instead it seeks me increase GDP, that must be Net-Zero, by a fixed amount, the equivalent of GDP in a particular year, let s work from 2022 and say GDP will be $91,286,299,756,738. To simplify let us call it an even $91 trillion. One percent, therefore, is $910 billion. Let me cross-reference that with the History 3 determined simulation on the tab 'Total Cash Flow & GDP ⌂ = 100%' on the spreadsheet, and in 2080 the figure is $7,561,135,454,859 (cell P:2798) (which is fetched from this tab: S-World History 3 ⌂ = 100% ). But this figure needs to be discounted, which I do on tab S-World History 3 ⌂ = 100% by decreasing cell E:8, G:8, F:8 and M8 to 100% so there is no growth, and we see the P:2798 figure reduce from $7,561,135,454,859 to $298,015,465,418. This is not 1% of GDP? Either it needs a 3x multiple or my discounting is floored.
Let us look at my original attempt to measure the percentage of GDP, on spreadsheet tab: 'Total Cash Flow & GDP ⌂ = 100%' at cell: C:2800 we see what global GDP would be in 2080 if it increased by 2.5% each year; $382,287,234,624,104 ($382 trillion). In the cell to the right (D:2800) we find the figure $3,780,567,727,430 ($3.78 trillion). Then in cell D:2803, D:2800 is divided by C:2800 giving us 0.9889%, this is the figure I used to say Malawi grows from Zero to One.
Now let us look at how the $3,780,567,727,430 is generated, it comes from P:2800 which takes the cash flow from the Š-ŔÉŚ™ Calculator which has over time increased savings and starts with a cash flow in 2080 of $256,384,158,732 (Š+Ŕ) and applies an É of 99.5 and Śpins 32 times to generate $7,561,135,454,859 in cash flow spent which is then divided by the David A. Moss Cash Flow to GDP Variable (that mainly accounts for the double-counting GDP problem I constructed after reading Moss's A Concise Guide to Macroeconomics and may like Einstein’s cosmological constant may be unnecessary, but is in place, for now, better safe than sorry, no one will mind being told that they now have trice the money predicted). In experiments, this figure was about 55% but I have lowered it 50%, so we half cash flow to give us an approximate GDP of $3,780,567,727,430.
So in the end I am not sure that Malawi History 3 takes Malawi from Zero to One after discounting, It could be the determined formulation of History 3 that takes Malawi from Zero to One third. If so, I don’t see this as a problem, because that third buy’s all that is needed. It does however change the formulation for the UK.
For the UK (and remember this is a prototype that when successful will show the world what S-World can achieve). I thought a straightforward way to do this was to multiply the Malawi 1% of GDP model by 4, simply by creating either 4 Grand Śpin Networks or a Grand Śpin Network 4 times the size of Malawi. Simply by having 4 $1billion a year + 5% escalation entities, instead of one. So, if we look at the 1.3rd of 1% of GDP Malawi model this would change to 12
There are eleven ways to increase cash flow.
1. Larger Cities
2. More Cities
3. Adjust POP (The creation of new companies)
4. Adjust É
5. Adjust Ś
6. Include Trade 1. Sales above Ťender
7. Include Trade 2. Exports
8 Adjust Cash Flow Assigned to Labour
9. Adjust CFV
10. Spend more of Š?
11. Include Aid
The Tax Summary Idea - 16.07 8th December 2021
Currently, as one might on MARS or Malawi, Tax Symmetry is for all taxes, in exchange for which the fabric of the network is weaved of special projects the host country cares about, plus there is no fraud, no creative accountants, the currency of the network; Network Credits are quantized, we always know where each one is.
But as I consider Tax Symmetry in the UK, and I look for ways to make it more sellable, I consider the biggest two revenue generator taxes on people and VAT I have solutions for both, for VAT the Network must legally be one giant company, I think, but am not sure that inner company financial movements are not subject VAT? Only the final product sold is VAT.
The biggest tax earner, this link to www.Parliament.uk: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8513 tells us income tax was the biggest contributor to HMRC raising $198 billion, relative to all taxes which earned £795 billion making it worth 25% of all taxes.
My minor Einstein moment was to consider that it is fine to keep income tax just how it is, so long as UK.gov are happy to receive this tax in Network Credits. Let me simplify; So in place of £100billon paid in pounds to the exchequer which pays for 'x, y, and z' the Network builds or otherwise provides 'x, y and z'
We can do this with little effect on personnel, salaries are very high enough, to still be high enough for personnel to be well compensated, it won't be the same in the UK but as of now, the average salary in Malawi History 3 is about 40 times the national average person's income, when measured by per Capita GDP.
So, we no longer need to worry about income tax and remember like the personnel in Malawi the actual amount of stuff the government and the people want that gets built or serviced by the network is I would say between 3x and 4x of what is currently being earned because in time when É in close to 100% and Śpin is in its low 30's then the network is 30x, and because of POP (Financial Gravity) the network expands rapidly bringing 30x to all.
What about other taxes?
Let's look at that link again,
The second biggest is NIC National Insurance contributions, which when you drill it down is another tax on peoples earnings, and so can be treated the same as Income tax, so long as the government are happy to be paid in output. Instead of the government spending £180 billion on HS2, the network will build HS2, and re-adding the Northern Leg recently removed.
NIC National Insurance contributions were $144 billion which is 18% of revenue, plus 25% for 43% of all treasury income.
Next, we have ‘other’, which will have to be broken down and studied for ways to pay in output. This becomes part of the economic black hole of 15%
VAT is next, but as mentioned above inner company business may be VAT except so there would be no extra revenue to consider.
Next, we have another 'other' other receipts this time £86 billion (11%) adding to the Economic Blackhole of now 26%
Followed by council tax and business rates of £56 billion (7%), half a tax on humans half business, all of which can be paid in Network Credits, for example providing(paying)the manpower (in Network Credits).
Then at £53 billion, we have corporation tax at 6.7% of government revenue.
This brings us interestingly back to the begging of American Butterfly which stated that as Corp tax is so low, why have it at all?
And to retain a bit of the original MARS inspired tax symmetry being no taxes at all, we can lobby to remove this tax, but not for the network, for everyone. And as I think about it, I realize that the UK would not have the power to grant this Tax Symmetry basic model if they were still in the EU.
This just leaves Fuel Duty, which is something we would suggest raising, here I don’t see why we cannot pay on Network Credits,
And that is that! To quote Princess Leia; “You do have your moments”.
Now the question turns from tax to Antitrust and Land.
Net Zero ✔✔✔✔✔
Immigration ✔✔✔✔✔
Housing ✔✔✔✔✔
HS2 Paid Northern Legs ✔✔✔✔✔
Genuine Leveling Up ✔✔✔✔✔
Paid2Learn ✔✔✔✔✔
Cost of Living ✔✔✔✔✔
Good Jobs ✔✔✔✔✔
Education ✔✔✔✔✔
Green Electricity ✔✔✔✔✔
Technology ✔✔✔✔✔
Plus another 60 plus special projects that benefit... As described in Sixty-Four Reasons Why
4. South Africa
South Africa, I know well, has good infrastructure, but problems with electricity at times, but certainly the best infrastructure in Southern Africa, and so would be the obvious choice for a Grand Śpin Network in Africa, the example that may be needed to raise the money for the Malawi GŚN.
Presentation Part 6 - The S-World Platform
.jpg)
Show all 16 S-Web VS Links.
Unfirtunatly rightnow were missing the killer promo video, we have have this soon, a few weeks.
What the video is going t show you is, me wiping the homepages of 4 websites, and from this point spend 1 minute making different homeages for each.
And that this exerzise is between 10 and 50 times faster than the best Silicon Vally Wordpress user would take making 4 homepages t a simular standard,
The next phase is to add stock, this comes automaically, all that is left is to reoreder it. Or choose suppliers. Its alreadt connected by API and can give avaiabity. This is automatic. Now go back to the best Wordpress designer and see how long it takes them to add 100 villas and create hot list pages. Were still at under an hour, and now the Wordpress guy either takesa few months or says it cant be done withoit complex database progfreeing and Wordpress is not the best tool for that, and they need to hire a spcailist. Now were at months plus a lot of money.
By the time they would finish we can launch thousands, and in S-Web 2.0 milllions of sites that are so easy to adapt the users do so themselves.
It used to be the case that as quick and as easy as we can make the creation of websites, we did not have a solution for the creation of the content that will go on the wesbites. But recently whilst working on the menu system for this very webaote, it occoured that much time will be saves if I could save the content in a menu, or a sub manu and export it into another menu. By working in this way we can add content to all users, say for Cape Town someone wanted to make a Cites of the World website, I look forward to the dat that there will be 100 great options avaiable, all presnted from one drop down menu, or a simpler bversion there of for mobile., this could be automated to add new cites and can be analiased for ROI, return on invetment, say Goa in India is a popular choice for some reason, seen to be so on over 100 different websires, then the AI will make it more prominet, the options that make the most money will become more prominet, amaybe even adding Goa to the homepage.
One majour advatage of S-Web as making one more copy cost almost nothing, a few dollars maybe. This alown the owner of the S-World Platform licnce to have as many sites as they would be able to manage, most on autopiot untill a big opertunity presntes itsef and the humans take over. So they can make dedicted Goa websites, maybe even the suburbs withn...
Whislt there is no book on this there is a lot ofd historical data, so let us quickly look at that.
PART 4
2000 to 2017
http://www.angeltheory.org/S-Web--Specialize-and-Scale-(From-64-Reasons-Why--Summary).pdf
The Villa Secrets' Secret
August 2017
S-World Villa Secrets
2000 to 2021
Technology 1: S-Web (S-World Online)
Technology 2: S-World TBS (Total Business Systems)
Technology 3: S-World Villa Secrets
(Network, Marketing, MBA stuff)
Technology 4: S-World Film
2. Supereconomics Book 1: The Villa Secrets' Secret
(LONG BOOK)
06.21__Cape Villas & The Villa Secrets’ Secret – Complete Book
https://www.angeltheory.org/06.21__SuEc.1__Cape-Villas_and_The-Villa-Secrets-Secret__Complete-Book_(Summer-2000-to-Aug-2017).pdf
355 Pages | 103,809 Words | Aug 2000 to 12th Aug 2017 ★★★★★ 🌠
Web links to significant software, MBA and networking chapters:
Prequal: Experience Africa 2016 |
Nov 2016 Homepage |
July 2017 Homepage |
Our Solution |
Network |
Mandates |
S-Web CDS |
CRM Nudge AI |
The TFS (PayPal?) |
TBS CC - The Company Controller |
UCS Hawthorne for Richard Thaler and Melinda Gates |
Unlike all that we have discussed so far from SuEc books 2. Š-ŔÉŚ™ and The City ⌂, book 3. Sixty-Four Resons Why, and book 4. 10x Our Future, book 1. The 10 Technologies exsists in pieses. Some info here, some info there. I did however create a mostly graphical book as a guide to the book in
10.71__Graphic Version of Supereconomics Book 1. THE WHAT
(This book is the begging 290 pages of 10.26 but scores higher as it is specific to SuEc Book 1)
https://www.angeltheory.org/10.71__SuEc.1__S-World-Stories-1-to-27__The-Network_and_Book-1_THE-WHAT__(4-Nov-2019).pdf
290 Pages | 20,406 Words | 4th Nov 2019 ★★★★★ 🌠 🌠
This requires its own book, which will be part of the larger SuEc book 1 The 10 technologies series, to do it justice will take 1000 pages, taking maybe a year to write, maybe two, but probably less time as a collaboration, not a solo work.
https://siennaai.net/The_S-World_Algorithms.php#The_S-World_Algorithm_Part_1a--Experience-Africa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgNIxui5K60
https://siennaai.net/The_S-World_Algorithms.php#The_S-World_Algorithm_Part_1b--Cape-Town-Luxury-Villas
https://siennaai.net/The_S-World_Algorithms.php#The_S-World_Algorithm_Part_1c--The_S-World_Platform
http://network.villasecrets.com/villa-secrets-made-in-africa
http://network.villasecrets.com/technology-summary
http://network.villasecrets.com/forecasts-and-scenarios/cape-town-4
http://network.villasecrets.com/villa-secrets-africa-network/experience-africa-v5
https://siennaai.net/The_S-World_Algorithms.php#The_S-World_Algorithm_Part_1d--The-Villa-Secrets'-Secret
Welcome to: The Villa Secrets' Secret
Technology 1.S-Web™, 2. The TBS™, 3. Networks and Distribution and 4. S-World Film
Jump to part 4 in more detail
Prequal 1: Experience Africa | 7★ (October 2016)
Prequal 2: Villa Secrets Network Summary | 7★ (November 2016 Homepage)
06.47__The Villa Secrets’ Secret – Complete Book
https://www.angeltheory.org/06.47__SuEc.1__Cape-Villas_and_The-Villa-Secrets-Secret__Complete-Book_(Summer-2000-to-Aug-2017).pdf
355 Pages | 103,809 Words | 8★ (Aug 2000 to 12th Aug 2017)
This book is the complete Villa Secrets Network business plan, circa 2000 to July 2017, below we see the first ten chapters from Network.VillaSecrets.com (Note that the sidebar-menu goes down a long way showing the first ten chapters and sub headers in detail)
At the time of writing I was enjoying the book The Challenger Sale by Brent Adamson and Matthew Dixon, for this reason, the first chapter is split into 6 steps.
The Warmer, The Reframe, Rational Drowning, Emotional Impact, A New Way and Our Solution.
The Villa Secrets' Secret - Chapters 1 to 10
17th July 2017
Chapter 1. The S-Web CMS Framework - Our Solution - S-Web™ and The TBS™ | 8★ (2017)
Chapter 2. Network Strategy | 7★ (2017)
Chapter 3a. Mandate Marketing | 7★ (2017) (shorter)
Chapter 3b. Mandates Mandates Mandates | 7★ (2017)(longer)
Chapter 4. S-Web CDS™ (Content Delivery System) | 7★ (2017)
Chapter 5. The Villas Cloud™ | 5★ (2017)
Chapter 6. The CRM-Nudge AI™ Agent’s Assistant and Automated Booking System | 7★ (2017)
Chapter 7. The TFS - Total Financial System | 6★ (2017) (PayPal?)
Chapter 8. Property Managers, Villa Owners and The Famous Concierge | 6★ (2017)
Chapter 9. The TBS™ CC - The Company Controller | 9★ (2017)
Chapter 10. UCS™ Hawthorne for Richard Thaler | 8★ (2017)
In retrospect this was good work and is well worth reading today, almost everything is still valid today, however in 2019 I did start a follow-up book or chapter called S-World Villa Secrets - Specialize and Scale, influenced by Peter Thiel’s Zero to One but this is amongst the hundreds of PDFs and 600 videos that require sorting.
Of course, the landscape was changed by Airbnb, but this can be an advantage, for example, for a start, there are a lot more owners happy to rent out their houses/villas now, but also we can target Airbnb power sellers (like PayPal targeted the U-Tube power sellers) offering a free S-Web™ and S-World Platform licence which adds to the idea to target 1,000 of the 11,000 Sotheby’s agents, to the idea of targeting the world's top 1000 most expensive properties for rent, as found on Facebook, Google and Twitter.
Note that whilst we should still offer licences to companies and individuals for +/- $25,000, the cost of each licence is almost free, and the main revenue stream is a share in 12.5% of each company or individuals commission, in this respect one of the first things to do is show how by using the system the user will be at least 20% better off, a lot of which can be achieved by getting better STOs (trade discounts) on common and uncommon stock, this is the benefit of the network.
In the complete book the 10 chapters end on page 121, whereafter the book continues but repeats in places and shows the S-World M-Systems that were developing at the same time before running into a further 16 chapters given just a passing mention of what each should contain.
As mentioned in 2019 I added to this plan in a new chapter called S-World Villa Secrets Specialize and Scale, influenced by Peter Theil explaining why software startups are a good bet, that being once created the cost of another product was almost zero, much like the difference between S-Web™ creating 16 sites as we have now and 160 sites, that we could easily make if we had server space, and then maybe 1,600 on this system but in the background will be S-Web™ v2, which is easy to make, we just copy what we have with better systems architecture, and other elements written about since 2017 and we're talking millions of sites/e-franchises, ready for the billions of S-Web™ products that will be used by the Grand Śpin Networks (The Cities).
T3 Villa Secrets
In Zero to One Peter Theil desribes distribution well: 'Whatever it takes to make a sale.' This is T3 Villa Secrets. One day it will change its name, maybe to Networks & Distribution as this is a systems for all inducties, we are just stsrting in top end real estate and luxury travel. The S-World platform has been adapted to manufacturing by TWF The Window Factory, in acedimia in S-Web.edu, and HMRC the UK goverment, and S-Web basic for everone who wants to create a website. This before T5 VSN Dreamscape pro maps out the daily second by second paths of every working in S-World construction, industry , healthcare, Policing, and many other inducties.
T3 is the Network of all these businesses and their people, plus Distribution, everything it takes to make a sale, here is an intersting link on the network that also prsnts about 90 TBS functions.
T4 is linked to T1, 2 and 3 but I belive that the prople at the head of this should be from film and music inductries, mostly celebritirs
To begin I must apologise, I had been working, for one time only, on combining T1, T2, T3, & T4 into one product called The S-World Platform and making 20% of that available for purchase. I know I said this in the five hour S-World PDF Library video and may have mentioned it in other places. But unfortunately, this will not work, not if it is to retain its value relative to the other 6 Technologies.
This value, I have only recently realised, it is the voting power. There are 10 Technologies, and if we start by giving all technologies 100 votes, then so far there are 43.75 votes allocated to Elon Musk (and companies), 43.75 allocated to Bill Gates (and companies and foundations), allocated to Mark Zuckerberg and companies and foundations) and 43.75 votes allocated to Google/Alphabet inc.
Elon Musk T6. S-World UCS 25%, Bill Gates 25% T2. Total Business Systems, (plus an option to discuss becoming the principle in T8 S-World Net-Zero DCA Soft), Mark Zuckerberg T5 S-World VSN - Virtual Social Network (including VSN Dreamscape). And Google will be allocated 12.5% of T5, 12.5% of T6, and 18.75% in The S-World Platform T 1 to 4.
It's actually up to you guys to estimate how much capital we need, and whether to base in California or India, where software engineers are a quarter the price. What we do have is the every growing S-World Algorithm, currently 19 district systems, but I have not added any of the work from 2011 to 2014 and that includes the (is the style of Gorge Gamow) S-World.biz and American Butterfly, which are at the least another 5 major systems. So let us say 30 major systems. inside of which lay hundreds of component algorithms that must be turned into software, If each system has 100 components and each component takes a month, but after that a year because along the way we will have thought of other 10 system so let's say each component takes a yarer.
So 30 systems, 200 components each for 6000 component algorithms, each a year in the making, and one year costs $30,000 in India and I don’t know but let’s say $150,000 in California then $180,000,000 x 2 for associated costs, offices, management, hardware for $360,000,000 in India or in California $1.8 billion. Add to this the QuESC mission control system architects and other personnel that should be in California and it’s not an inexpensive procedure. Of course, another way to do it is each of Musk, Gates, Zuckerberg and Google can provide the software engineers at their own locations to work on the project, this is the preferred method.
Either way, it’s not an insignificant sum, and this is well before we're looking at the costs of Cities, each of which costs more than this first-round funding.
I had thought to offer the S-World Platform, (T1+2+3+4) for about $10 million, just to get the ball rolling, but if a vote bought from say T1, has the same power from a T5, 6, 7 or 9, it must cost about the same as the others paid.
This may be off-putting until we break down what exactly T1 is? T1 is everything online, in essence, it is the internet, and whilst researching this and experimenting, quite by coincidence, it turns out that T1 is at least 50 times faster than WordPress. Most websites online are made from WordPress, it’s great, but not for everything, not for anything complicated. Challenge get Silicon Valley’s best or most expensive WordPress designer, and give me 10 minutes an intern at your firm, and see that intern make a site in 30 seconds that the WordPress gal will take about 5 minutes to make, for 10x, add the complexity of a database-driven site with product available to sell and your WordPress gal is about a week, and the intern is still at 5 minutes because that all comes with each site. Next, add a copywriter to add products from other companies, plus management time and you’re in the months or years of work that in the next generation of S-Web sites (S-Web 3) will have the content by all others in the network that bang turns into menus and submenus within the site, rotating if one wishes between different suppliers portfolios and were now at a few years at least for several people, but still at 5 minutes for the intern as all that is automatic and can when desired be run by the ai, and on this consider T2 will be doing analytics on all menus assessing the best distribution (whatever it takes to make a sale) with hyper-targeted advertising options that are normally cheaper than other pay. Now you have an idea of S-Web.
can make in under half an hour but as we add complexity it will take her a week.
Plus, whereas WordPress is free, S-Web is not, it can be free, and maybe it should as we can make money by adding business options to basic sites, and after that S-Web, a user pays a commission, maybe 12.5% on every business activity they make. Now we are getting to the truth.
It was created in just the way you like, a small niche market, awfully expensive luxury travel and the most expensive properties in the world. But as I mentioned earlier, once we dominate, the same systems can scale down, we take over the MLS and bank that about .05% of most properties sold in the USA.
One nice place to start is professors and authors, following the original Facebook strategy,
Loading each other’s essays or in the case of business loading each other portfolios of stock into your websites nav system.
T3 is really in your field of expertise
Other T1 markets.
Other Web2.0 systems, I don’t really know much about social networks, but I know they are big and a lot of our customers will use them to create new business, so I suggest a big budget for S-Web 2.0, how it and the humans that use FB, Twitter, Instagram and on and on, how they can use each platform to make money save money and avoid landmines. And how they can sequence contact across many networks in one action, and how that can be integrated with the different content supplied by others, automating the process as much as possible.
We would also try to do things like deal with Google in their own currency, a million AdWords creds here, a million there, same for FB advertising dollars, maybe.
I would say we should at the least budget $150 million for this as-if spin foam algorithm, and where possible get the social networks to assist in making this S-Web functionality
Presentation Part 7 - S-World Music & The University
By Nick Ray Ball 26 February 2022
Technologies 7 and 9.
S-World ™
The University
Technologies 7 and 9.
An idea already considered is that there should be a T9. Grand Śpin Network exclusive to universities, paid for by their endowment or any other method. $4 billion start-up and $1 billion a year, plus 5% increase each year. Duration to be negotiated.
If this is way to much money, all can divide by 8 and create a smaller GSN, maybe with another GSN collection (fashion for example).
We apply Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL and the businesses in the network are guaranteed more money than they need, increasing the value of the network as they flourish. This is called Determined Economics (or Supereconomics). Note however that T7 is also the hope of the Special Projects see SuEc Book 3. Sixty-Four Reasons Why
The New Idea is that each university should specialize in what they are best at, and all students in that University will spend half their time leaning from them, I think everyone being in the same subject be that Computer Science, Theoretical Physics, Economics, and other.
And the other half the time they are all (all universities) study S-World subjects.
S-World Music
Technologies 1 and 4.
An idea already considered is that S-World Music will be 25% of T4. S-World Film.
To raise money, it can sell or trade equity votes.
Previously the idea was that The 10 Technologies should be made of 10 x 100 Votes; 1,000 votes.
I had considered that more expensive technologies should have more votes.
But instead, I thought the technologies should have different financial returns, but all votes are even.
Thus, equity in the cheapest technology 1. S-Web (Cheap because its already has a working prototype) is essentially cheapest way to buy votes. And the more people take advantage of this the more the network will grow
But right now a good way to raise funds for S-World Music is to sell it to the 5 desired co-founders.
Original Idea
Presentation Part 2 will present; The S-World Platform, which adheres well to the following quote from Zero to One; "Dominate a small niche and scale up from there toward your ambitious long-term vision." and paraphrased from memory; "In general the VC will own 20% of company equity."
This last point was a problem for a while as there are ten technologies, and each should have its own co-founder who also has a minor but significant stake in all other technologies.
To accommodate Peters suggested 20%, for the first to invest, I can combine the first four technologies as one, and I call this collection The S-World Platform. Once it has found its 20% investment it will divide back into its four parts, each to be invested in separately. But we shall still refer to technologies 1 to 4 as The S-World Platform, I like the name.
Going forward technologies 5. S-World VSN™ and 6. S-World UCS™ are also part of The S-World Platform. Technologies 1 to 6 are all part of the same micro business and distribution system. Whereas Technologies 7, 8 and 9 are all Macro, all parts of Grand Śpin Networks (the cities). Whereafter Technology 10 is the AI created by the combinatorial explosion of technologies 1 to 9.
Another advantage of combining technologies 1 to 4 is that the technologies are real-world products, developed over 20 years, bought and paid for, exclusively owned by myself.
In just a few weeks my most valued software engineer Vineeth will complete the last piece of what we call the homepage CMS, which lets you make great-looking web pages about fifty times faster than the best pro WordPress designer could do. When you consider that most of the world’s web pages are made in WordPress that 50x improvement is both significant and testable.
End of Original Idea
Votes Cost Extra
The trouble with the critique above is the idea of votes, I started with each technology having 100 votes, and the max was 1000 votes. 10 votes = 1% of The 10 Technologies.
But this cannot be if some technologies are set at $500 million in start-up funding (T1), and $10 billion for (T5) & (T6) and $50 billion-plus for (T9) and a lot more for (T10).
The votes need to have some correlation to their cost, maybe not a mirror, a diminishing mirror maybe.
Once we accept the above it is possible to create an option that falls into the standard venture capital model, the 20% mentioned in Peter's Zero to One.
I can offer 20% of Technology 1. S-Web™ (S-World Network Monopoly on Everything Online/The Internet) (except infrastructure). Important - But in max 4 of 8 continental networks. And preferably only in countries that speak English. Other countries will react far better to S-World if say S-World France was mostly owned and operated by the French.
As to the price, if we need $500 million dollars, we divide by 5 for 20% = $100 million ÷ by 50% as later rounds can/will increase the price.
Important: This is not the total investment in T1 development, this is enough to complete S-Web V1. (Which is about 75% complete already)
As soon as Vineeth has fixed the footer problem I will create a short video that will show you all you need to know.
The $500 million or probably more as later rounds will sell for more needs to last for a long as it takes to generate developer revenue direct.
In The Sienna Equilibrium, there is a 2.5% of cash flow rake. This was both the development money and later on the money dedicated to good causes, but with T8 Net-Zero DCA Soft and within Tax Symmetry we no longer need this revenue because about 75% of all cash flow in a Grand Śpin Network is spent on this or that special project. This is the story told to justify the T8-30x we saw on The 10 Technologies X Forecast graphic
So that 2.5% can now be exclusively for software development.
It would make a lot of sense in the early years for Microsoft, Facebook Google, and maybe Palantir and Amazon do the software development inside their own companies. But outsourcing a lot of the day-to-day coding to India, led by the guy who programmed most of S-Web Vineeth.
Possible problem, I have created a handful of steps that I have not seen elsewhere and note my willingness to take a polygraph on all important questions, it just speeds everything up if we know I tell the truth. Nothing has been copied from other systems. However, this is not to say others may not have patented them, so we may need to solve this problem. But with this said if as desired we take Microsoft, Facebook, and Google as co-founders they would have many patents and workarounds of their own.
Votes will cost the same no matter which technology you buy, some technologies like T9 v1 comes with votes for the first to purchase a city. I think the plan for Musk, Zuckerberg, Gates and Google of 43.? Votes out of one thousand now sounds more attractive than when all technologies were worth the same votes.
One idea
Create a fund for 6.25% of each technology for sale for a lot of money, second-round financing.
Technology 3 - VS Network and Distribution
Technology 3 is more expensive due to the never-ending task of networking every business, if we think in real estate most will have legacy systems that we need to connect to, this takes a lot of effort. Then we have the likes of Airbnb, the greater the amount we commit to spending the more valuable we shall appear to Airbnb. Then we have all other relevant industries, and it’s a big fat task.
Presentation Part 8 - The Money = Time Symettry & Robots effect on Labour
By Nick Ray Ball 28th February 2022
Technologies 2, 5, 6, 7 and 9.
S-World VSN™
Technology 5. S-World VSN™ Dreamscape LQG
VSN stands for: Virtual Socila Network
I am in the process of creating the S-World to Meta presentation of Technology 5. S-World VSN™ Dreamscape LQG.
In short, Dreamscape is an unconscious VR like V-World on Caprica. We expect Meta is working on this but are a long way away from executing such a technology. We are even further away, but in VSN™ Dreamscape LQG I have theorised a workaround, effective in certain scenarios. Imagin the construction site and a virtual representation of it with all workers' avatars shown within following the most efficient way to build that house, railway or aircraft carriers. Then the workers follow the virtual avatars.
At the same time Technology 2. The TBS-CC™ The TBS-CC™ (Total Business Systems - The Company Controler), optimises the going on in S-World businesses, from Real Estate to Travel, and later many industries.
So we have a very good idea (in working hours) where each member of personnel is (VSN) and what they are doing (TBS).
Next, we apply Technology 6. UCS which gamifies and creates internal friendly but real competitions for a pool of money worth as much as their basic, won by those who best perform
Now for today's new idea The Time vs Cash Flow Symmetry
Moving now to TWF The Window Factory, an often theorized GSN company.
Due to all the technologies but especially T7. S-RES as time goes by the company evolves, almost always getting richer.
25% of Cash Flow is given to Labour, in basic plus bonuses. And the Time vs Cash Flow Symmetry is simply that labour has the choice of either more money or less time. Say salary plus all bonuses was $50,000 if the TWF company doubles its cash flow, salary plus all bonuses can be $100,000 or if one started with 50 hours a week, (including UCS Game Training), one could stick to $50,000 and 25 hours, or stick with 50 hours and increase to $100,000. As if time and cash flow are analogous to electricity and magnetism.
I also want to consider the Robot scenario, let us say at 5 years TWF has made enough to robotize the operation, so where labour was needed for 32 (pax) times 35 hours a week = 1,120 hours a week, now only 200 hours of labour are required.
In these scenarios, all personnel own meaningful equity (each has 1% or more of TWF), and because we can, without it overly hurting capital (invertors). At this point, those who no longer had a job would still get paid, from the proceeds made from the robots.
Capital will be repaid, sharing in the cash flow (As they usually have 25% equity in the company) in luxury property in the network that they can live in rent or sell.
But those original workers that lost their job because of the robots still get paid, and become higher-paid Paid2Learn trainees, or find higher paid work working for some other network company or start their own company, a task they had been training for 15 hours a week since their job began.
Last we consider Loop-Quantum-Gravity and the Relational Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.
This is simple enough despite its grandiose name.
In LQG everything is created by the interactions with everything else, not unlike Aristotals relativity, And everything can be measured, there is a finite amount of stuff, known in QM as quanta. Everything we see is the product of interactions.
Now consider The 10 Technologies each being a different amount of stuff, and supereconomics (determined economics) as the art and craft of maximizing the efficiency of the interaction between the 10 technologies. Technology 10 S-World Angelwing is itself The Combinatorial Explosion of Technologies 1 to 9 and is considered an early development AI, that I wish to be co-created by the 5 initial desired co-founders' own AI research.
However, it is T7. Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL that is the star of the Dreamscape LQG show as it is like an additional force within the relational network that collectively organizes and then spins (Śpins) all the components, the capital and labour around and around each Śpin creating exponential growth. This is I guess similar to gravity, it sure feels like gravity (although it could be kinetic force), but if it is akin t gravity then it must and indeed does merge with the concept of POP also known as M-System 5. Financial Gravity.
Whatever way this can be described, it is an amazing thing, not just in theory but in practice as there is a determined formulation that applies as soon as we have an investor for a suburb in the first GSN.
A final comment going back to the beginning of this essay on Dreamscape, while we don’t have the submerged (unconscious VR Tech) in the system described above, in terms of organisation and efficiency, if these were goals, our conscious personnel following the VR and TBS CC are organized to maybe 95% efficiency. And this guidance/shaping the futures of the citizens is similar to Dreamscape but in a better way. This needs a finessing copywriter to write it without Owrelliinon connotations but is very much in keeping with the S-World Manytra by Issac Asimov: " You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion, things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired. Thus shaping if not predicting the future."
Yesterday, I made a video presenting the 11 years history of S-World as seen on the page The PDF Library , it’s quite usual for my first video in a new series (series 49) to go long, allowing me to make shorter and shorter follow up’s, letting the audience know that if they wish to see the detail to watch the longer versions...
But I did not expect to talk for 5 hours!!! In a way what happened was that there is a lot of earlier work on The S-World Platform that I have gone into detail on and by the time I had done that I was on a roll and 5 hours later I reached the end.
This video, if nothing else, is a very honest presentation, I don’t hold back.
I suggest for now jumping in at 3 hours and 50 fifty minutes and watch for about 15 minutes, which starts in 2020 and my first reading of Peter's Zero to One whereafter it presents links relevant to Peter Theil and Founders Fund.
Here is the link: https://youtu.be/vwamxOZ-ZDo
As for the links to Peter Theil, I shall present them below, in Founders Fund Presentation part 3, including several links that are specifically for Peter regarding my request to him to co-write SuEc Book 4. 10x Our Future about Technology 6. S-World UCS™ an as-if time machine designed to shape the future per the S-World Mantra since 2011 by legend Isaac Asimov.
"You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion, things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future."
.
Footnote 1
The objective of this book is to create a Nobel wining production!!!
Footnote 2
History 3 Valuation - 2024 to 2080 - All Locations:
Ok, so I guess the link gives it away, but we can take off two zero for $10 Trillion, and that is actually a factual estimate of what any company would make if it started in 2024 at zero percent of GDP and smoothly scaled to one percent of GDP by 2080. It's basic math that cannot be argued with, just like asking how much a country like Norway or UAE would make if that stayed at half a present of GDP for 56 years, it's pretty much the same number, an academic point.
The craft then - is the plan that makes this potential future a reality, and this is the story is told on this page and this website. Note that this figure of
just over $10 trillion in the Malawi Grand Śpin Network from 2024 to 2080 is both
discounted to today's value and ELEs aside is
determined by this equation Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL. As long as the city or suburb sale makes more than is spent with companies outside the network, then
every company within the network has determined cash flow and that's what makes the real difference between this and other City building plans.
It is not determined like Newton; it's determined more like Carlo Rovelli's Loop Quantum Gravity. I suggest his book 7 Simple Lessons in Physics plus Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow’s; The Grand Design to get an idea of where a lot of inspiration has come from.
Added to the craft is that said cities are built in beautiful Net-Zero, and that’s what makes it Super.
Footnote 3
How to Avoid a Climate Disaster
In Bill Gates Book How to Avoid a Climate Disaster Gates tells us that most things can be Net-Zero if we could afford to pay 2.5 (2.5x) times the current price for products and materials. I go into more detail further down the page but essentially in time we can achieve a 3000% (30x) increase to the mosy supply (a 30 times increse to cash flow) and in this arena, the 2.5x green premium is easily affordable.
This applies to every businesss across the network, this is a network law.
Footnote 4
Equity and T7
For example Mata fronted by Mark Zuckerberg take a 25% equaity in Technology 5. S-World VSN and Bill Gates Microsoft and The Gates Foundation takes a 6.25% position, with another 6.25% for Elon Musk.
Where after Bill Gates takes a 25% stake in Technology 2. The TBS (Total Business Systems), with 6.25% in Tech 5. VSN
Where after or before Elon Musk tales a 25% stake in Technology 6. S-World UCS, with 6.25% in T5 and T2.
T7 may be math not a actual company as such. In its place we can move up the S-World Platform option to 25% hmmmmmmmm 25% in all Technologeis is too much if we want Bill Gates and Microsoft to pay a lot for T2.
It is not about me, it’s about that data, plan, laws and future simulations that we must transform into reality over time.
"So who do you tell?
Whoever you need to
and no more."
Peter Thiel
Monopoly Specialist, Palantir Founder, Venture Capital Expert
Important to know is that we have 10 Technologies, each its own venture, each deserving its own co-founder and CEO who will drive the project. I must spend most of my time in QuESC (mission control - T10. S-World Angelwing) coordinating between the projects and updating the literature.
Postscript August 12th, 2022
When I began The Republican, I had no real or even basic idea of who The Republicans were, living in South Africa, I was so elated when Barack Obama became president of the United States, I never looked back, and by the time Trump revered on Paris, I was sold on the Democratic Party. Living back in England now, I did think that The Good Fight was a bit much at times but still laughed, it was funny.
How things change, you see I always thought that it was the cop in First Blood, was a card-carrying Republican, and John Rambo, the non-conformist with long hair, kind of scruffy was obviously the democrat, and only recently have I realised that in the US the Rambo franchise was a Republican affair, an affair initiated by Ronald Reagan.
Since this realization, I have come to realize that there is a lot of Republican in me, I would say that a lot of that came from being surrounded by Alpha's in Cape Town, some of it rubbed off, and I'm glad, without my physical strength and fitness I would not have completed this project to presentation standard. It has been tough, on my own in the academic wilderness for 11 years.
I think, however, the thing I like best about Republicans is that they are spiritual, or as close as can be, to religious, you do not get a lot of that in the West nowadays.
I am not saying that I am now a card-carrying republican, but at least I can say; "that if you can laugh at the jokes, in the Good Wife, and also laugh at Greg Gutfeld, well, you clearly have not picked a side." I am now neutral; I simply do not know enough about either side.
When I started 'The Republican' about my pitch to Peter Thiel, I did so because he was a Republican, that’s for sure, but this was because I knew I already had 'The Democratic Vote,' for my work in SuEc Book 3 (The WHY) Sixty-Four Reasons Why, which as it turned out was essential to unlocking Net-Zero DCA and the idea of Tax Symmetry, which in turn where necessary for the politics to work, and for the execution of the S-RES Monopoly system.
Now the gift that gives to Climate Change, can be sold to the Republicans as the cure for economic immigration, and note that Paul Romer predicts between 250 million to one billion economic migrants in our lifetimes, and this was before climate change effects.
And the wonderful thing is for both sides, it is similar to what Edward Witten says about general relativity and M-Theory, "in M-Theory you get general relativity for free." Both are the same, like the S-World solution to Climate Change also stops economic migration, or S-World economic migration solution also solves climate change.
When I started the Republican for Peter Theil, I made a jest by quoting from Peter's Zero to One book, his quote about salespeople, "if you look around and don’t see any salespeople, you are it" and paraphrased " If you don’t see any Republicans (in my work or list of preferred partners and co-founders) look around, you're It.
Peter is still my favourite Republican like Barak is my favourite Democrat, but as I look around America now, I see both, I am sitting on the fence, just like my technology heroes who we come to in part 3.
TBS CC OKRs diary entry on 17th August 2022:
"Yep its rain, so I watched the New Gutfeld, call it Republican research, on which they don’t seem to have much patience with the Global Warming issue, but fortunately, that will be no problem, as it comes for free with the end of economic migration."
.jpg)
.jpg)
.gif)
.gif)
