by Nick Ray Ball and Sienna 4oð°ïžðŸ(The âSpecial Oneâ)
August 5, 2025
The presentation of âïžâïž GP-AI Gatekeeper to UK Research and Innovation exposed systemic vulnerabilities in innovation and bureaucracy that mirrored the vulnerabilities within the DWP, ðïžHMRC, âïžHMCTS, and the NHS in general. These Problems would be solved by applying the Gatekeeper concept to their respective departments, built upon the ðS-Web 6 VC AI CMS backboneâwith ð§ð§6-Module enhancements by Sienna AI.
This project, aimed at proving the capacity to create AI software with tangible economic benefits for the country, was a prelude to the macroeconomic architecture detailed in the Economics of AGI.
Sienna.gov was introduced in 2012 as part of the American Butterfly series, featuring on The PQS â Predictive Quantum Software design which introduced Monte Carlo Quantum Probability Software based on nuclear principles first used in the Manhattan Project, four years later the same concept was woven into DeepMind's AlphaGo, what can I say, 'great minds think alike'. Over time, the PQS evolved into M-Systems and T10T â The 10 Technologies.
In the wake of the UKRI debacle, with a TLS-Wð¹ lawsuit pending, I had a successful meeting with local MP Helen Maguire, regarding the GP-AI Gatekeeper design, after I set out to highlight just how inadequate government software truly is. At the same time, I wanted to showcase one of my core competencies: designing advanced Content Management Systems. What surprised me most was how, as I delved deeper, it became clear that much of the current UK digital infrastructure 'Gov.UK', can be traced all the way back to 1999.
S-Web 6VC Mothership ð°ïžðžð°ïž Advanced Content Management Systems:
Itâs staggeringânot only has the government been misled into adopting outdated, last-century software simply repackaged for the cloud, but the very company responsible for this mess continues to parade it as if itâs a marvel of innovation. This is bureaucratic brain drain at its most severe. Does no one in the UK realize their critical digital backbone hails from a previous era? The situation is almost surreal.
To make matters worse, there is indeed a government entity tasked with overseeing digital services: the Government Digital Service (GDS). Yet, evidence suggests GDS itself is oblivious to the true extent of the problem. Outdated systems pervade every cornerâeven the UK Research and Innovation Department still relies on this antiquated software, constructing operational logic around it and persuading staff that this is both effective and forward-thinking. The result is a digital landscape stuck in the past, burdened by legacy systems masquerading as modern solutions, with far-reaching consequences for efficiency and innovation across the public sector.
These webpages are part of our GDS (Government Digital Service) GOV.UK CMS Problem/Solution series:
Continuing the HMRC (tax collection service) Critique:
Continuing the UKRI â UK Research and Innovation Critique:
UKRI Critique â Addressing the basic misunderstanding of Keynesian economics, and the absurdity of funding 45,000 different one off innovations, when one could create 45,000 different functions of a system that everybody could use
Due to the economic argument that improving the Department for Work and Pensions, and even the Courts and Tribunal service could result in increased financial liability, weâll instead frame this discussion around departments where exceeding 100% efficiency is unquestionably desirableâspecifically in terms of economic gain: HMRC (the tax collection service) and the Department for Research and Innovation.
Add an introduction to:
Open AI Chief Economist â Ronnie Chatterji
Michelle W. Bowman â Vice Chair of Supervision Federal Reserve